If you are lurker please help us grow the community by commenting and posting interesting on topic quality info/discussions so we can attract more people and make this community more interesting to spend time on. ✌️
Previous milestone: https://lemmy.fmhy.ml/post/389193
Next goals: 400, 550, 700, 850, 1000
8 Comments
lemonh3ad@kbin.social · 0 pts · 3y
The antiwork sub devolved into a negative circlejerk, I hope workreform takes a foothold instead. It’s not realistic to be anti work, it takes work to survive and thrive. It’s a matter of having thoughtful discussions on a realistic way to attain a proper balance. This comes from someone who subbed to antiwork right away and transitioned to the workreform sub. Either way, good luck and fight the good fight!
Martineski@lemmy.fmhy.ml · 0 pts · 3y
Any things that you want to see and don't want to see on this sub? And please explain me more about wdym by "negative circlejerk".
Drusas@kbin.social · 0 pts · 3y
I'm not who you asked, but I can explain it.
I was banned from the sub because I pointed out that a local politician is divisive and largely disliked by the leftist community here (it's about 50/50 whether leftists here like her or absolutely hate her). Coincidentally, she happens to be a registered socialist. Because she is a socialist, and I spoke negatively of her, I was banned. I was able to back up how disliked she is with articles and whatnot, but she's a socialist, so you can't say anything bad about her.
If this community is going to be the same, I want no part in it.
lemonh3ad@kbin.social · 0 pts · 3y
I don’t know about all that, I just don’t think it’s smart to put effort into a new place to discuss work reform and make the same mistake and call it antiwork again.
Drusas@kbin.social · 0 pts · 3y
I agree. I preferred the workreform sub. Seemed more mature.
Martineski@lemmy.fmhy.ml · 0 pts · 3y
I named it both to hit more keywords when people search for subs, now I can't back out from that because the permament name is called antiwork. :x
lemonh3ad@kbin.social · 0 pts · 3y
Have you seen this one?
@workreform