Hollywood and the death of the garage inventor
How we lost Doc Brown and got Tony Stark
https://www.thenewatlantis.com/publications/the-demise-of-the-garage-inventor
https://www.thenewatlantis.com/publications/the-demise-of-the-garage-inventor
Hollywood and the death of the garage inventor
3 Comments
Pisodeuorrior@kbin.social · 2 pts · 3y
What a wonderfully written piece, they're so rare to come by lately. Thanks!
throwsbooks@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 3y
Good read!
This is all sort of in the same vein as how Jobs is remembered in the public consciousness but Wozniak overall forgotten.
StillPaisleyCat@startrek.website · 1 pts · 3y
An interesting reflection. Thanks OP for sharing.
Star Trek does get a call out near its conclusion.
One of the things that I would find worthy of a discussion is how scientific progress and working the problem to get to the technical solve seems to have been downplayed in the new era of shows.
Prodigy seems to have been an intentional exception as a STEM teaching vehicle, but the other shows have risked offering platitudes like ‘I like science’ in place of risking technobabble explanations.
The aversion to technobabble comes through in interviews with the writers and the actors. Most seem not to appreciate that the technobabble is about representing the process of science and engineering as much or more than the science fiction explanation.
Instead, Discovery and SNW have been offering us isolated, prickly, introverted, eccentric and/or awkward geniuses without much insight into their process. While I love all these characters, I miss the aspiration of competent and inventive teams that we saw in the 90s shows.
One of the reasons Voyager is well loved is because it showed its intelligence officers cooperating to work a problem to adapt or invent their way out of one dire situation after another. Is possible to have neurodiverse and other representations in the inventive roles in Trek while also showing integrated and functional teams working together. I’d like them to try.