What messaging app do you recommend?

7 points · 24 comments · view on lemmy.world

24 Comments

Scrabbone@discuss.tchncs.de · 5 pts · 3y (3 replies)

Element as matrix client. It has some bugs and glitches but is the current best matrix client and the matrix protocol is the best communication protocol i know.

GatoB@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 3y (2 replies)

Why do you think it is the best protocol?

Scrabbone@discuss.tchncs.de · 6 pts · 3y (1 reply)

The protocol is open and well documented, it is fast, you can transmit everything from Voice over IP to IoT, it works decentralised and supports end-to-end encryption.

Scrabbone@discuss.tchncs.de · 4 pts · 3y

https://spec.matrix.org/latest/ Here ist the specification website if you want to read more

MiDwqN@feddit.de · 4 pts · 3y

Signal

awderon@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 3y (6 replies)

In the current times Signal is the only viable way on mobile. On PC Matrix is a good alternative for chatrooms with friends.

countstex@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 3y

I use Element on Android to access my Matrix account, keeps everything on one network for me that way.

GatoB@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 3y (4 replies)

Why Signal over other alternatives like Telegram?

awderon@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 3y (3 replies)

Signal is mainly used by the people I communicate with. The Founder of Signal is also a known Computer Security expert. The signal protocol itself is also used by WhatsApp, Google Messages and Faccebook Messages.

I just had a look at the telegram privacy policy (https://telegram.org/privacy#8-who-your-personal-data-may-be-shared-with) and compared to signals privacy policy (https://signal.org/legal/) telegrams policy is just not for me.

GatoB@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 3y (2 replies)

Whats wrong with Telegram one?

awderon@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 3y

Their company construct and data sharing within that construct just doesn't align with my values.

CrypticCoffee@lemm.ee · 2 pts · 3y

It isn't e2e encrypted. I think they use some form of roll your own encryption and the server theoretically can access the messages. Signal is just better from a privacy perspective.

BlackRose@slrpnk.net · 4 pts · 3y
dvdnet90@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 3y

Signal for private and Whatsapp for work.

xill47@lemm.ee · 1 pts · 3y (1 reply)

I recently started beta-testing Beeper. I was on the hunt/wait for a nice to use client that would be finally able to get all my messengers into a single window for a very very long time (when all my massaging was through XMPP, ICQ and Skype I used to use Trillian), and it is almost it: Telrgram, WhatsApp, SMS and Discord DMs/chat channels in a single app/window.

xill47@lemm.ee · 1 pts · 3y

Keep in mind I value convinience over privacy, but still am mindful about what I send where. Beeper server is not open source, but their bridges are (and encrypt messages before sending to server), and you are able to self host them, I saw in community chat room that some people do that for Signal, so everything is E2E encrypted on hardware under user control.

MdRuckus@lemmy.world · -1 pts · 3y (6 replies)
[ removed ]
GatoB@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 3y (4 replies)

I also like it, IMO it has the best balance between privacy and cool features

asbestos@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 3y (3 replies)

It has no encryption by default.

MdRuckus@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 3y

True, but it doesn't take a genius to start an e2e message. It's really easy.

GatoB@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 3y (1 reply)
asbestos@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 3y

I should have specified that it doesn’t have E2E encryption by default, because transport encryption is absolutely standard and there’s no messenger that doesn’t have it.
I said “by default” because while secret chats are end-to-end encrypted, they aren’t the default.

CrypticCoffee@lemm.ee · 1 pts · 3y

I'm pretty sure it doesn't use e2e encryption. I think they have their own roll your own encryption that theoretically the server can access the content of your messages. No thanks.