c/programmerhumor · by produnis@discuss.tchncs.de · 3ybugs 417 points · 16 comments · view on lemmy.world
16 Comments
NoisyFlake@lemm.ee · 16 pts · 3y
wtf, is this just obscured javascript?
nailbar@sopuli.xyz · 22 pts · 3y
It looks like it's decompiled from something, so all the variable names are missing and instead presented with whatever index they had in the binary.
But that's just a wild guess. I don't know what actual decompiled code looks like.
Edit: scratch that, it's just obfuscated code to make it harder to copy.
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/11932567/found-this-nasty-code-i-wonder-what-it-does-should-i-be-worried#11932708
SurpriseWaterfall@sopuli.xyz · 10 pts · 3y
I thought it was decompiled code at first to, but the function names are still real words. It's almost like it was manually obfuscated by replacing all the variable names.
nailbar@sopuli.xyz · 3 pts · 3y
Found it. It's just obfuscated to make it harder to copy.
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/11932567/found-this-nasty-code-i-wonder-what-it-does-should-i-be-worried#11932708
hemmes@vlemmy.net · 1 pts · 3y
I don’t think you’re far off because obfuscated code usually has less structured variable references.
bAZtARd@feddit.de · 14 pts · 3y
An LLM could probably solve this much quicker than a human.
SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 8 pts · 3y
Finally, the ultimate weapon
A tool to parse horrible code
noughtnaut@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 3y
Mission fucking accomplished
himawari@lemmy.4d2.org · 11 pts · 3y
needs more jpeg
hglman@lemmy.ml · 4 pts · 3y
Then the machines could pass the test.
michaeljo94@discuss.tchncs.de · 4 pts · 3y
Litterally me, before ChatGPT was a thing
jeff@programming.dev · 2 pts · 3y
lgtm skip
speaker_hat@lemmy.one · 2 pts · 3y
This is a nightmare material
sgtnasty@lemmy.ml · 1 pts · 3y
A nightmare of mine, prob all JS code too