Population control

627 points · 11 comments · view on lemmy.world

11 Comments

ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca · 34 pts · 2y (2 replies)

There was an economic study done between smokers and non-smokers to determine which were larger drains of social spending. The assumption was since smokers would be receiving more medical care due to their unhealthy habit, they would be a larger drain economically. The researchers found that smokers die so quickly that their healthcare costs and pension costs were much lower than non-smokers.

Dagnet@lemmy.world · 19 pts · 2y (1 reply)

Maybe I should start thanking smokers for their selflessness and sacrifice

Lepsea@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 2y

Deleted by creator

olutukko@lemmy.world · 17 pts · 2y

We really should bring back the asbesto filters to speed up the process

QProphecy@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 2y (1 reply)
Poringo@lemm.ee · 2 pts · 2y

Wow a blast from the past

xantoxis@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 2y
[ removed ]
Mio@feddit.nu · 4 pts · 2y (1 reply)

When they smoke, others could die as well

peteypete420@sh.itjust.works · 6 pts · 2y

That's like a two for one for the environment.

Hailstorm8440@sh.itjust.works · 3 pts · 2y

He’s got a point

fckreddit@lemmy.ml · 2 pts · 2y (1 reply)

Not fast enough to reduce the damage to the environment.

RandomVideos@programming.dev · -5 pts · 2y

Thats why we should implement active methods of doing this

AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 2y
[ removed ]