Twitter is “tanking” amid Threads’ surging popularity, analysts say

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2023/07/twitter-is-tanking-amid-threads-surging-popularity-analysts-say/

121 points · 9 comments · view on lemmy.world

9 Comments

eugenia@lemmy.world · 27 pts · 3y (2 replies)

In terms of reaching lots of people I haven't had much luck with either Threads or Bluesky to be honest. I tried both, and I wasn't really that impressed with crickets. The best are chronological feeds with or without keywords/hashtag searching. For that, I stay loyal to open source, federated systems. I get more eyes on chronologically-based social media than either of any of these corporate ones.

MrJukes@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 3y (1 reply)

crickets

AssaultPepper@kbin.social · 7 pts · 3y

🦗🦗🦗

paddirn@lemmy.world · 26 pts · 3y (1 reply)

To paraphrase Gen. Hux: “I don’t care if Zuckerberg wins, I just need Musk to lose!”

rageagainstmachines@lemmy.world · 22 pts · 3y

Hmm idk, I'd really prefer they both lose. Because when either one wins, we all lose.

NarrativeBear@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 3y (1 reply)

What's the difference between Bluesky and Mastodon?

AndreTelevise@kbin.social · 8 pts · 3y

Mastodon: open-source, in the fediverse, open for signups (depending on the instance)
Bluesky: proprietary, invite-only (for now), not in the fediverse but has its own network of domains

id_kai@kbin.social · 4 pts · 3y

I don't get the appeal of Threads, even if it wasn't run by Zuck. There's no Followed tab, you see literally everyone unless you decide to mute everything you do t want (which is a lot), and the search sucks. Oh, and it's not in chronological order.