CVE-2024-3094: Urgent alert for Fedora Linux 40 and Rawhide users

https://fedoramagazine.org/cve-2024-3094-security-alert-f40-rawhide/

165 points · 17 comments · view on lemmy.world

17 Comments

thurstylark@lemm.ee · 41 pts · 2y (6 replies)

Me: fixes exposure to vuln

Also me: grabs popcorn

This is going to be an interesting story once this all quiets down...

Bitrot@lemmy.sdf.org · 48 pts · 2y (3 replies)

Gonna take a bit. The dudes been doing the releases for over a year, everything they touched is suspect now even if nothing earlier is known. Also some other associated accounts have been doing shady stuff too.

And that’s just one project that had a burnt out maintainer who welcomed some help from this guy. There are probably others. The hobby project becoming a core piece is a big issue.

SuperIce@lemmy.world · 20 pts · 2y

Yeah, it looks like that little Jenga block from the xkcd meme was XZ and a bunch of infrastructure is gonna have issues because of it.

brunacho@scribe.disroot.org · 10 pts · 2y (1 reply)

Gonna take a bit. The dudes been doing the releases for over a year, everything they touched is suspect now even if nothing earlier is known. Also some other associated accounts have been doing shady stuff too.

gonna take even a bit more now. Github closed the account and project making it really difficult to see their commits and merges and analyze them.

Bitrot@lemmy.sdf.org · 6 pts · 2y

It’s also at https://git.tukaani.org.

theshatterstone54@feddit.uk · 5 pts · 2y (1 reply)

Fixes exposure

It says F39 users are not affected. Are you running Rawhide/F40 Beta? p

thurstylark@lemm.ee · 10 pts · 2y

Running Arch, so not really exposed, but still had a compromised version installed.

wolf@lemmy.zip · 26 pts · 2y (1 reply)

Mandatory XKCD: Dependency

leopold@lemmy.kde.social · 15 pts · 2y
wolf@lemmy.zip · 23 pts · 2y (5 replies)

Supply chain attacks are extremely cheap/easy and very effective, so get prepared for more of them in the future.

It really bothers me, that many companies make billions utilizing open source without contributing money/employees etc. to secure/supply/maintain supply chains.

RedNight@lemmy.ml · 11 pts · 2y (4 replies)

This one might not have been that cheap. The malicious code was added by a maintainer on the project for two years. That is some patience

wolf@lemmy.zip · 6 pts · 2y

Agreed. I am more speaking of 'in general', for example there was a supply chain attack on a widely used npm package by writing an email to the author of the npm package. There are other 'cheap' attacks like dependency confusion, typo squatting etc.

NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 2y (2 replies)

What about finding someone like this and then blackmailing them?

That would be cheaper

SMillerNL@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 2y (1 reply)
bassomitron@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 2y

Lol, too true. It's either that or honeytraps

steal_your_face@lemmy.ml · 10 pts · 2y

Happy it doesn’t affect stable versions

delirious_owl@discuss.online · 2 pts · 2y

Did they intentionally not put the package name in the headline just to draw more clicks? Ffs

annata20@discuss.tchncs.de · 1 pts · 2y
[ removed ]