Am I reading it correctly that it only affects remote admin? Isn't that generally considered to be a Very Bad Idea? My home network has remote admin disabled, but with VPN access I can remotely manage it, which is (afaik?) a way more secure method than having public https access to your network gear...
Still pretty unimpressive by Cisco to basically just say "sucks to be you" to the owners. I get that it's EOL but still.
4 Comments
slazer2au@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 2y
Oh It's that time of year again where Cisco says the Cisco RV series is broken move off it.
Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works · 3 pts · 2y
They should move to a service only business model. Or the business model where Oracle just sues you for daring to be their customer...
qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website · 5 pts · 2y
Am I reading it correctly that it only affects remote admin? Isn't that generally considered to be a Very Bad Idea? My home network has remote admin disabled, but with VPN access I can remotely manage it, which is (afaik?) a way more secure method than having public https access to your network gear...
Still pretty unimpressive by Cisco to basically just say "sucks to be you" to the owners. I get that it's EOL but still.
Xin_shill@lemm.ee · 1 pts · 2y
This seems kinda criminal