My thought exactly. Really enjoyed this article. Thanks OP! I’m excited they are releasing more about their findings. I would also like to know what questions the new technology has answered beyond more dynamic pictures. I guess this photo wasn’t possible with Hubble?
9 Comments
swan_pr@lemmy.world · 23 pts · 3y
I never thought I'd say this after reading an Arstechnica article, but this was beautifully written.
qprimed@lemmy.ml · 14 pts · 3y
just my take, but ars is one of the few commercial sites that can almost get an automatic headline upvote before reading the article... almost
still a pretty impressive feat these days. hopefully it stays that way.
swan_pr@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 3y
Agreed, I never feel taken for a ride or baited into clicking their articles.
stardust@lemm.ee · 6 pts · 3y
I thought the same thing! I can't believe it's already been a year, so amazing what we've been able to learn with Webb.
Chipthemonk@lemmy.fmhy.ml · 5 pts · 3y
My thought exactly. Really enjoyed this article. Thanks OP! I’m excited they are releasing more about their findings. I would also like to know what questions the new technology has answered beyond more dynamic pictures. I guess this photo wasn’t possible with Hubble?
smitty@lemmy.world · 11 pts · 3y
As galactic scales go, that’s really close
baronvonj@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 3y
Does that mean the image is from 390 years ago?
smitty@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 3y
Yes, if one of those stars blew up 389 years ago, we’d see it next year
eldoom@lemm.ee · 1 pts · 3y
All I can see is an axolotl minotaur...