I've recently been made aware of the non-sustainable business of Spotify (and other streaming services) https://youtu.be/gDfNRWsMRsU .
I think the best solution for all parties would be a federated streaming service. Instances could be hosted by record labels or indi-Artists. Of course there needs to be a fair donation/subscription. (Maybe similar to Patreon - get some extra goodies for supporting your artist directly)
Does something similar exist already? I would rather put my money somewhere where small artists are actually paid fairly for their work. (And put my own works there as well)
Thanks for reading :) I wish you a very pleasant day and I'm looking forward for your input.
12 Comments
squirrel@discuss.tchncs.de · 23 pts · 3y
We have Funkwhale on the Fediverse. https://open.audio/ is the biggest instance I think.
Lennard@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 3y
I looked at it, but got kinda confused. The instance I logged in didn't seem to share any music with other instances.
locness3@discuss.tchncs.de · 20 pts · 3y
aleph@lemm.ee · 10 pts · 3y
Obligatory mention of Bandcamp and Qobuz here - buying music outright ensures a much bigger payout for the artists.
Salix@sh.itjust.works · 3 pts · 3y
Unfortunately, not everyone can afford that. Spotify family plan is significantly cheaper than buying every single album from every artist I and my family listens to. Just for myself, I'd have to spend $5000+ for the amount of music I listen to if I bought the mp3 or flac files.
Lennard@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 3y
That's a great point. While I don't think streaming services can uphold their low prices (and I'm also happy to pay 20 bucks when the artists gets a fair share) I think buying all albums you maybe wanna listen to is way to expensive. Buying music also raises the barrier to discovering new music and cultivatinng a diverse taste in music.
Lennard@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 3y
I agree that it's a great way to support your artist, but honestly I don't think it stands a chance to become as big as streaming services. The convince of being able to explore almost every artists catalogue at the touch of a button is just too good. (Also great for sharing music or creating a shared playlist)
I think the problem of storage space is also often overlooked. Not everyone has enough storage on their device. (I know I didn't, when I still used MP3s on a modern smartphone)
locness3@discuss.tchncs.de · 2 pts · 3y
locness3@discuss.tchncs.de · 2 pts · 3y
PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks · 17 pts · 3y
Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/gDfNRWsMRsU
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.
Navarian@lemm.ee · 8 pts · 3y
I worry that something like this would rapidly become the equivalent of paying for a hundred different shitty TV channels from cable TV so that you could get the few good ones you were actually interested in.
Lennard@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 3y
I guess that's a possibility. But I think most artists want their work (at least their studio records) to be available to as many listeners as possible. I think paywalling most content will not be successful for the artist nor the record label. (The same way exclusivity deals with streaming services haven't really worked out).
But I wouldn't really mind paying 1 dollar per artist for some bonus tracks, when I know that when 6000 people do the same they will be able to succeed financially