I wish people just used clang-tidy instead of pushing all the crap that's out there, like for instance PC-Lint Plus. At work the head of IT makes our work a living hell by insisting the CI runs a shit beta version of PC-Lint Plus which lacks full C++17 support and we have to reinvent stuff like variants and deprive ourselves of many C++ features because of one single linting tool.
6 Comments
jormaig@programming.dev · 8 pts · 3y
I would recommend clang-tidy. You can have it running if you use the clangd Language Server.
glad_cat@lemmy.sdf.org · 3 pts · 3y
+1 for clang-tidy because clang is good. There is also scan-build in clang but it's a PITA to use.
And for OP, you can also install sonarlint on some editors/IDE but I don't know if the scanned code is sent remotely or not.
zbb@mastodon.social · 3 pts · 3y
@glad_cat @jormaig
Here's also a good resource for linters and formatters, sorted by languages:
https://github.com/caramelomartins/awesome-linters
nitefox@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 3y
I will go with this, thank you!
AlmightySnoo@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 3y
I wish people just used clang-tidy instead of pushing all the crap that's out there, like for instance PC-Lint Plus. At work the head of IT makes our work a living hell by insisting the CI runs a shit beta version of PC-Lint Plus which lacks full C++17 support and we have to reinvent stuff like variants and deprive ourselves of many C++ features because of one single linting tool.
auv_guy@programming.dev · 2 pts · 3y
I use cppcheck.