Cisco firewall 0-days under attack for 5 months by resourceful nation-state hackers

https://arstechnica.com/security/2024/04/cisco-firewall-0-days-under-attack-for-5-months-by-resourceful-nation-state-hackers/

126 points · 8 comments · view on lemmy.world

8 Comments

foggy@lemmy.world · 32 pts · 2y (3 replies)

Dude something fucking wild is brewing in cyber warfare. I can feel it in my news feed.

sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works · 23 pts · 2y (1 reply)

April has been wild so far, like 4 high profile vulnerabilities:

  • xz - mostly impacted ssh
  • Windows batch files
  • php via glibc
  • GitHub malware hosting

And now this. I'm probably missing some as well.

Lumilias@pawb.social · 15 pts · 2y

Yep, you forgot Palo Alto’s GlobalProtect telemetry allowing for remote code execution. A perfect 10.

HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 2y

China and Russia preparing to strike when election turmoil is ripe

autotldr@lemmings.world · 11 pts · 2y

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Hackers backed by a powerful nation-state have been exploiting two zero-day vulnerabilities in Cisco firewalls in a five-month-long campaign that breaks into government networks around the world, researchers reported Wednesday.

These devices are ideal targets because they sit at the edge of a network, provide a direct pipeline to its most sensitive resources, and interact with virtually all incoming communications.

Those characteristics, combined with a small cast of selected targets all in government, have led Talos to assess that the attacks are the work of government-backed hackers motivated by espionage objectives.

“Our attribution assessment is based on the victimology, the significant level of tradecraft employed in terms of capability development and anti-forensic measures, and the identification and subsequent chaining together of 0-day vulnerabilities,” Talos researchers wrote.

“Regardless of your network equipment provider, now is the time to ensure that the devices are properly patched, logging to a central, secure location, and configured to have strong, multi-factor authentication (MFA),” the researchers wrote.

It stems from improper validation of files when they’re read from the flash memory of a vulnerable device and allows for remote code execution with root system privileges when exploited.


The original article contains 533 words, the summary contains 191 words. Saved 64%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

IHawkMike@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 2y (2 replies)

ASAs are still way more prevalent than they should be when Palo Alto and others are much better options. Still, I'm glad I barely have to deal with them any more.

pete_the_cat@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 2y (1 reply)

Palo Alto just had their own massive flaw exposed.

IHawkMike@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 2y

Oh yeah. They all do/will. But they are still better firewalls than ASAs.