Arch Linux - News: OpenBLAS >= 0.3.23-2 update requires manual intervention

https://archlinux.org/news/openblas-0323-2-update-requires-manual-intervention/

23 points · 6 comments · view on lemmy.world

6 Comments

patatahooligan@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 3y (3 replies)

Reading up on the issue, I understand that openblas is superior to blas in performance. So if I have blas I should replace it with blas-openblas. Am I correct in this understanding?

odseey@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 3y (2 replies)

that's how I read it too in general, unless you want squeeze the maximum performance you can of a specific application, then you will need to benchmark each implementation, (including other options such as mkl) and see in practice which is superior for you.

patatahooligan@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 3y (1 reply)

Meh I don't use it enough to warrant the effort of benchmarking. I just wanted a really general "if you don't know what you want, your should probably use X", and it appears that I should just use blas-openblas.

odseey@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 3y

yes definitely, I am also going to just install blas-openblas and forget about it, however I just added the part about benchmarking for people that run research/ machine-learning stuff regularly , figuring out which implementation is faster for their use case is worth it.

croobat@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 3y (1 reply)

Wish I could have seen this before, yesterday I spent quite a minute uninstalling, updating and reinstalling all my blas packages (Krita, Gimp, Inkscape, FreeCAD, etc).

I reeally should be more attentive with the archlinux posts... 😂

Tiuku@sopuli.xyz · 2 pts · 3y

Have you heard of informant?