I honestly can't take any review seriously that has to do such aggressive mental gymnastics to blame the audience for a movie doing bad. Completely missing the point as well IMO that many of the issues of that movie were that it was a lazy, poorly done retrace of the previous movies.
It was horribly written, just like the other sequels. The Wachowskis aren't good filmmakers, and are even worse at content development. What a stupid article.
7 Comments
w00master@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 3y
The real reason? No one wanted it nor asked for it.
Servais@lemmy.ml · 2 pts · 3y
Interesting take. I found it bad even without this analysis, but it's interesting to have an other perspective.
_ed@sopuli.xyz · 2 pts · 3y
Yeah the headline is pure clickbait. The movie can just suck because… it wasn’t good.
newline@feddit.nl · 2 pts · 3y
Wow... This review is huge pile of horse shit 😂
I honestly can't take any review seriously that has to do such aggressive mental gymnastics to blame the audience for a movie doing bad. Completely missing the point as well IMO that many of the issues of that movie were that it was a lazy, poorly done retrace of the previous movies.
just_another_person@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 3y
It was horribly written, just like the other sequels. The Wachowskis aren't good filmmakers, and are even worse at content development. What a stupid article.
fox@beehaw.org · 0 pts · 3y
Animatrix > Matrix 1 > Matrix 4 > Matrix DeZIONized
_ed@sopuli.xyz · 2 pts · 3y
Now I’m going to have to checkout dezion I’m assuming the two are cut together. Probably still pretty ponderous.
Animatrix was fantastic no doubt.