Wrong method, correct solution?
The interesting question now is how many similar fractions this is true for
If I had to guess I'd say infinitely many, but I'm in no way competent enough to prove it
When you screw up so much, Stephen bloody Hawking needs to get up and calm down Einstein not to beat you up.
I'm shook
Fun fact: I ran it through Wolfram|Alpha. The result actually checks out. And if we try 163x2, well, 3x2 = 6, 6x2 = 12, and 1x2 = 2 obviously. So 200 + 120 + 6 = 326. thus, 163/326 = 1/2
6 Comments
Pfnic@feddit.ch · 26 pts · 3y
Wrong method, correct solution?
deepthot@lemmy.sdf.org · 12 pts · 3y
The interesting question now is how many similar fractions this is true for
ReveredOxygen@sh.itjust.works · 3 pts · 3y
If I had to guess I'd say infinitely many, but I'm in no way competent enough to prove it
TheEntity@kbin.social · 5 pts · 3y
When you screw up so much, Stephen bloody Hawking needs to get up and calm down Einstein not to beat you up.
IntergalacticTowel@lemmy.sdf.org · 2 pts · 3y
I'm shook
Iron_Lynx@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 3y
Fun fact: I ran it through Wolfram|Alpha. The result actually checks out. And if we try 163x2, well, 3x2 = 6, 6x2 = 12, and 1x2 = 2 obviously. So 200 + 120 + 6 = 326. thus, 163/326 = 1/2