I bike as my primary form of commute / transportation, and whenever I hit a pothole or go over some particularly rough patches of road I worry that overtime this could damage the watch. Anyone have any insight into this? I did a bit of research and it seems like many watches these days have some sort of shock-resistance in the form of Incabloc or other technologies. But then I see posts like this which are worrying...
5 Comments
Perdendosi@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 3y
TL;dr-- yes, shocks might cause harm to mechanical watches. The amount of shock that can cause harm, and the risk of harm, are hard to calculate. Whether you decide to wear a mechanical watch while biking is a decision you have to make based upon your risk tolerance.
WooChooTrain@kbin.social · 1 pts · 3y
Thanks for your detailed response! These are all good things to keep in mind. I guess it really comes down to risk vs. reward. There's not really a specific benefit to me of wearing a watch while biking, it's more of a convenience thing (I'll likely be wearing my watch before and after my commute). Maybe it's better to keep the watch in a bag, where the shock is less direct (through my body and the bag), whereas on my wrist the shocks are fairly direct from the handlebars.
leftascenter@discuss.tchncs.de · 1 pts · 3y
No shock-absorbtion system will be totally shock-proof. At least there will be fatigue.
So yes, the risk is real. As well as that of the strap breaking and the watch falling.
ratamacue@lemmy.sdf.org · 1 pts · 3y
Nah. Soldiers have been shooting with mechanical watches for about 100 years. Your arm absorbs the bulk of the vibration. Here's an article about playing golf with a watch..
Also, I cringe every time I read "why risk it".
Sharpiemarker@feddit.de · 1 pts · 3y
Any mechanical watch has the potential to be damaged by excess vibration. Up to you if you think the risks are worth it. I wear an automatic watch all the time but it's also not terribly expensive; so if it dies, I can just replace it.