What is the effective difference between using intransitive verbs and passive voice?

We just covered transitiivi vs intransitiivi in my Finnish class this week.

Is there much of a difference of meaning between using a transitive verb in passive voice compared to using an intransitive verb? It seems to be mostly the same in my foreigner's mind.

9 points · 3 comments · view on lemmy.world

3 Comments

squirrel_bear@suppo.fi · 2 pts · 3y

As a native speaker, I have no idea about the grammar. If you give examples it might be easier to explain.

ThatDamnFinnishGuy@sopuli.xyz · 1 pts · 3y

I'll preface by saying I'm not a native speaker, I just finished the fourth module of kototumiskoulutus.

I believe the difference is object. Intransitive actions don't have objects but passive does have an unknown or unsaid object.

After looking this up quick I found exactly what you might be looking for.

https://uusikielemme.fi/finnish-grammar/verbs/types-of-verbs/transitivity-and-intransitivity-different-derivation-types

Section 4 covers the intransitive versus passive. I believe 4.2 especially shows where the confusion may be.