But that’s why it’s so nice that there are some gems who actually have scientifically backed formulations, or even better: contribute to science by doing studies and creating new categories!
But that’s why it’s so nice that there are some gems who actually have scientifically backed formulations, or even better: contribute to science by doing studies and creating new categories!
7 Comments
Alanjaow@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 3y
Aren't the majority of skin care things (and makeup) tested on animals though?
Chais@sh.itjust.works · 5 pts · 3y
In regards to safety, yes. They have to make sure you don't develop a rash or something. Good thing there are regulations for that, otherwise at least some companies would try without that, too.
akrz@programming.dev · 0 pts · 3y
i mean if it is required for safety reasons then that's okay imo
EdanGrey@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 3y
It's not required though, many companies do just fine without the testing on animals while still being compliant.
akrz@programming.dev · 3 pts · 3y
Often those companies just use ingredients and formulations that have been tested on animals by other companies and the patent has run out/it is not patented. Companies doing animal testing probably would not do animal testing on such products too. Most companies try to avoid costs.
agissilver@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 3y
P&G does some interesting anti-aging research involving genetics. I saw a talk about it some years ago when I was in chemistry graduate school.
SK-II is therefore probably legit but it's too expensive for me.
akrz@programming.dev · 1 pts · 3y
you just sent me down a 30 min google spiral hahah, thank you for the tip!