This came to me in a vision.

r*ddit

81 points · 11 comments · view on lemmy.world

11 Comments

maynarkh@feddit.nl · 25 pts · 2y (3 replies)

It's spelled bullpup, fellow degenerate.

Like the energy though.

Jordans_Vision@lemm.ee · 4 pts · 2y
[ removed ]
wwaxen@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 2y

"Bullup" is what you yell to someone before they slam into the ground.

zakobjoa@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 2y

"Bullup" is what the MC yells just before the DJ violently rewinds the record.

Jordans_Vision@lemm.ee · 9 pts · 2y
[ removed ]
Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works · 7 pts · 2y

You know, I'd place the unmanned planes between me and the enemy... But you do you.

And009@lemmynsfw.com · 4 pts · 2y

Hmm

jaschen@lemm.ee · 4 pts · 2y (5 replies)

Why do that when someone remotely can independently fly the other two and be even more useful?

kersploosh@sh.itjust.works · 9 pts · 2y

We went through all this trouble to develop the F-15. It would be a crime against humanity to leave it on the ground.

CptBread@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 2y (3 replies)

Harder to disrupt communications?

jaschen@lemm.ee · 4 pts · 2y (2 replies)

I mean, I'm assuming the connection types between the drone operator from both base and the pilot would be the same as in terms of disrupting communications.

I think the main difference between a drone operator from a base would have some sort of lag time, but having 3 brains working against 1 opponent would make up for the difference.

Shoot, why even have the pilot there. Just 3 drones vs 1 opponent would be even better.

CptBread@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 2y (1 reply)

With the plane near the drones the connection can be purely by line of sight communication which practically can't be disrupted.

If we imagine an all out war against a near peer opponent remote control from a drone base is a lot harder to do.

jaschen@lemm.ee · 2 pts · 2y

That is true.