Gotta love people so thirsty for blood in politics that even the indirect suggestion that aggressing political violence is a bad thing makes them explode in a temper tantrum about how you'd be on the side of the worst dictators in history because something something only revolution that sticks is a violent revolution something something "read theory shitlib"
Nevermind how nearly all those violent revolutions also didn't stick long term.
4 Comments
Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 2y
You're right, assassination is now politically acceptable. You go first.
I'm completely confident liberals will never feel the consequence of opening the door for more political violence.
Reverendender@sh.itjust.works · 3 pts · 2y
Modern Liberal here. I quite like this one.
PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee · 2 pts · 2y
Gotta love people so thirsty for blood in politics that even the indirect suggestion that aggressing political violence is a bad thing makes them explode in a temper tantrum about how you'd be on the side of the worst dictators in history because something something only revolution that sticks is a violent revolution something something "read theory shitlib"
Nevermind how nearly all those violent revolutions also didn't stick long term.
kinther@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 2y
Low quality shitpost