Petition: Bitcoin is Stupid and Does Not Deserve an Emoji

35 crypto companies made a Change Dot Org petition called "Bitcoin Deserves an Emoji"

F that

Sign this one instead: "Bitcoin is Stupid and Does Not Deserve an Emoji": https://www.change.org/bitcoin-is-stupid

395 points · 109 comments · view on lemmy.world

109 Comments

tiramichu@lemm.ee · 123 pts · 2y (18 replies)

Emojis should be purely generic, and not represent an individual product or service.

No apple logo. No BMW logo. Generic.

Imagine if every brand had a fucking emoji, what a wasteland that would be. And then in years to come the unicode character space is littered with dead brands that have gone the way of the dinosaur but still living on in emoji form like digital trash, because emoji are permanent. There's no taking it out once it's made.

So I'd support an emoji to represent the notion of 'digital currency' but it should be generic, not Bitcoin.

LostXOR@fedia.io · 32 pts · 2y (4 replies)
[ removed ]
V0ldek@awful.systems · 17 pts · 2y (2 replies)

lul

froztbyte@awful.systems · 7 pts · 2y (1 reply)

it renders as the co logo on fruitcompany hardware

although now I wanna go check the codepoint to see why it rendered as that on your side

mii@awful.systems · 13 pts · 2y

https://codepoints.net/U+f8ff

On Apple devices some installed fonts contain the Apple logo at this position. However, it is not recommended to use it in this way, since people with other operating systems will most probably not see this character.

The ConScript Unicode Registry suggests to use this codepoint for the Klingon Mummification Glyph. This encoding has been endorsed by the Klingon Language Institute.

lol

FMEEE@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 6 pts · 2y

Jup I can't btw fuck Apple.

EddoWagt@feddit.nl · 11 pts · 2y (11 replies)

We already have a bunch of currency specific emojis, so it's already too late for this notion πŸ’±πŸ’²πŸ’°πŸͺ™πŸ’·πŸ’ΆπŸ’΄πŸ’΅πŸ’Έ

trashgirlfriend@lemmy.world · 40 pts · 2y (7 replies)

Bitcoin is not a currency

technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com · -1 pts · 2y

Why not?

EddoWagt@feddit.nl · -12 pts · 2y (5 replies)

Depends on who you ask

banghida@lemm.ee · 23 pts · 2y (4 replies)

It is a good lithmus test indeed.

technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com · -6 pts · 2y (3 replies)

Yes it tests whether someone knows what a currency is.

gerikson@awful.systems · 8 pts · 2y (1 reply)

Appealing to Wikipedia is... a choice.

froztbyte@awful.systems · 7 pts · 2y

banghida@lemm.ee · 6 pts · 2y

It says enough about a person's worldview and education if they are serious about bitcoin being a viable currency. Specifically bitcoin. That was my point.

Irelephant@lemm.ee · 1 pts · 1y

There is a bitcoin unicode symbol though. β‚Ώ

tiramichu@lemm.ee · -7 pts · 2y (1 reply)

A lot of things exist in emoji because of early adopter advantage. A lot of the money stuff is either dollar or yen for this reason because they were first to the table. It's the same reason there are also so many other non-money emoji that represent quite uniquely Japanese cultural concepts in there.

There's a heck of a lot of world currency missing from emoji, but I would never suggest adding them all in. Everyone across the world is quite happy to use emoji with $ on as a synonym for 'money' regardless of what currency they actually use, so that already gets the job done as "generic money symbol"

It works because $ is so culturally ubiquitous.

When it comes to designing a new emoji that represents 'digital currency' we could take a similar approach as with fiat currency and just pick the most well known one (BTC) and roll with it.

But my preference would be to do otherwise, and design a non-specific emoji which represents the concept but without just being an existing logo.

EddoWagt@feddit.nl · 4 pts · 2y

There's a heck of a lot of world currency missing from emoji, but I would never suggest adding them all in.

Me neither, I actually think there are way too many emoji already

Wilzax@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 2y

πŸ’·πŸ’ΆπŸ’΅πŸ’΄ Bitcoin should be an orange note with a β‚Ώ on the left side, just like the other specific currency emojis.

It will piss the crypto bros off that their special Internet money looks the same as fiat

bitofhope@awful.systems · 36 pts · 2y (1 reply)

Why on earth an emoji anyway? $, €, Β£ and Β₯ aren't emoji either.

And now that I look, Unicode already has β‚Ώ (U+20BF BITCOIN SIGN). Just use that. Or better yet, don't.

bountygiver@lemmy.ml · 11 pts · 2y

o really? πŸ’΅πŸ’ΆπŸ’΄πŸ’·

but seeing these are physical representation of those currencies.. bitcoin's emoji can be a usb stick (at least having an actual USB stick emoji can be useful in some cases like when making guides)

swlabr@awful.systems · 32 pts · 2y (2 replies)

We already have πŸ…±οΈ

lobut@lemmy.ca · 28 pts · 2y

we also have πŸ’©

atro_city@fedia.io · 10 pts · 2y

ay πŸ…±οΈπŸ…±οΈ, wan sum fuk?

dgerard@awful.systems · 27 pts · 2y (4 replies)

how did this of all the posts break containment

froztbyte@awful.systems · 9 pts · 2y (1 reply)

crossposting, I think, but I was also 🀨 for a moment there..

froztbyte@awful.systems · 8 pts · 2y

wait no it's not literally crossposted

yeah I got nothing.

smallpatatas@lemm.ee · 6 pts · 2y

I'm sorry πŸ˜‚

swlabr@awful.systems · 6 pts · 2y

We assumed too much good faith. Time to lock it down

carlitoscohones@awful.systems · 23 pts · 2y

Potatisen@lemmy.world · 22 pts · 2y (23 replies)

Who gives an actual fuck?

michael@westergaard.social · 26 pts · 2y

a change.org petition, for or against bitcoin, is the perfect manifestation of bitcoin: entirely pointless

aasatru@kbin.earth · 16 pts · 2y (19 replies)

Well.

Step one. Bitcoin gets emoji.
Step two. Young people and other folks with fragile minds think it's legit because it has an emoji.
Step three. Poor people lose their money.
Outcome: The rich get rich, the poor stay poor.

Alternatively: Step one. Bitcoin gets emoji.
Step two. Young people and other folks with fragile minds think it's legit because it has an emoji.
Step three. Crypto currencies keep burning through resources as if it was a Brazilian rainforest.
Outcome: The few lucky ones will feel really stupid living in their bunkers after the collapse.

FireTower@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 2y (4 replies)

🀯: me when ☦️, β˜ͺ️, ☯️, ☸️, ✝️, πŸ•‰οΈ, ✑️ all have emojis making each one legitimate.

They're stupid internet pictures people aren't going to make financial decisions off of them.

aasatru@kbin.earth · 8 pts · 2y (3 replies)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_religion

They're all legitimate, doesn't make them factual.

laughterlaughter@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 2y (1 reply)

There is also an emoji for thieves. A cute one, even. Will young people start living that thug life because of the emoji?

zbyte64@awful.systems · 16 pts · 2y

How do you think the whole "be gay, do crimes" started? /s

lemmytellyousomething@lemmy.dbzer0.com · -3 pts · 2y

What exactly is your definition of legitimate?

Potatisen@lemmy.world · -1 pts · 2y
[ removed ]
laughterlaughter@lemmy.world · -6 pts · 2y (10 replies)
[ removed ]
ebu@awful.systems · 20 pts · 2y (6 replies)

I don't think emojis should be the place to have a socio-political discussion.

have some entirely non-political emojis:

πŸ—³οΈ: BALLOT BOX WITH BALLOT

πŸ‡ΉπŸ‡Ό: FLAG: TAIWAN

πŸ‡΅πŸ‡Έ: FLAG: PALESTINIAN TERRITORIES

πŸ—½: STATUE OF LIBERTY

🀑: FACE OF "NON-POLITICAL" PERSON

laughterlaughter@lemmy.world · -3 pts · 2y (5 replies)
[ removed ]
dgerard@awful.systems · 6 pts · 2y (2 replies)

this isn't debate club, come back later

self@awful.systems · 6 pts · 2y

addendum to what my co-admin said: don’t come back later, these posts are so fucking terrible I don’t want them in my database

laughterlaughter@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 2y

Fair enough. Apologies.

Evinceo@awful.systems · 3 pts · 2y (1 reply)

When does it just become free advertising though? Should McDonald's get an arches emoji?

laughterlaughter@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 2y

Fair point. However, I don't think bitcoin represents one single company, though.

the_post_of_tom_joad@sh.itjust.works · 8 pts · 2y
[ removed ]
zbyte64@awful.systems · 6 pts · 2y (1 reply)

If scientology had an emoji then the comparison would be apt.

laughterlaughter@lemmy.world · -3 pts · 2y
[ removed ]
lemmytellyousomething@lemmy.dbzer0.com · -7 pts · 2y (1 reply)

There is a wine emoji.... There is a cigarette emoji...

People with fragile mind could think that it's perfectly healthy to consume that stuff.............

There is even a bomb emoji....... People with fragile mind could......

Edit: Thanks for the dislikes. Negativity is way better than sharing arguments!!!!!111

self@awful.systems · 8 pts · 2y

Edit: Thanks for the dislikes. Negativity is way better than sharing arguments!!!111

yeah you’re annoying as fuck and we don’t need your posts

saltesc@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 2y (1 reply)

There's people out there that don't think emojis are as stupid as Bitcoin. Or maybe it's the other way around. Either way, there's some people out there and they're wrong.

aasatru@kbin.earth · 7 pts · 2y

πŸ€”

blindbunny@lemmy.ml · 19 pts · 2y (1 reply)

Bitcoin has an emoji but moths don't... Wtf

Blisterexe@lemmy.zip · 9 pts · 2y

It doesnt have an emoji yet

aasatru@kbin.earth · 18 pts · 2y

Easier to distinguish between people who want to establish a patriarchal white ethno-state, and people who just like ancient Greek sculpture

Nice.

self@awful.systems · 17 pts · 2y

edit: how dare you downvote my surely good points that bitcoins are worthy of not just an emoji but a nobel prize!!!!!

adding this to your post will get you laughed at and then banned

oo1@lemmings.world · 16 pts · 2y (4 replies)

Bitcoin is stupid and therefore deserves an emoji. It is not worthy of ascii-art. (_!_)

Edit , this shitty webpage doesn't support ascii-art. Re-edit, needed to add escape characters, true art is always born out of struggle.

SynopsisTantilize@lemm.ee · 8 pts · 2y (3 replies)

Is...that supposed to be a butthole or a theigh gap

dgerard@awful.systems · 6 pts · 2y (2 replies)

a butt, per the logo of this sub

SynopsisTantilize@lemm.ee · 5 pts · 2y (1 reply)

Yea but the exclamation has a dot for an asshole or something. That's what I'm asking about

blindbunny@lemmy.ml · 2 pts · 2y
[ removed ]
BlueMonday1984@awful.systems · 14 pts · 2y

On the one hand, Bitcoin as an emoji would be basically useless.

On the other hand, it could work as an easy shorthand for "scam"

andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works · 12 pts · 2y

robux emoji when?

Fedizen@lemmy.world · 12 pts · 2y (28 replies)

crime coin should be banned since its only use case is illegal activity

0laura@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 2y (2 replies)

I thought lemmy would be the kind of place that'd support ways to pay for things that don't need to be approved by a government. not all laws are just.

Fedizen@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 2y (1 reply)

Theoretically: I love the idea of bitcoin.

Realistically: it requires exchanges, large amounts of power, etc.

Plus, governments have little interest in making illegal behavior easy. Many of the economic costs of bitcoin are that its an easy way to make stolen goods inaccessible.

If all bitcoin had to be purchased and sold in cash without credit cards or electronic banking I think it would make far more sense as a form of e-cash. But as it is, I think it damages society more than it benefits - which is the easiest justification for outright banning commercial usage of it.

0laura@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 2y

monero >> Bitcoin. it's a lot more scalable and until recently you could easily buy it with cash

programmer_belch@lemmy.dbzer0.com · -6 pts · 2y (22 replies)

You can't ban the roads because smugglers use them

dgerard@awful.systems · 18 pts · 2y (20 replies)

we can ban the crime coin because literally the coiners themselves admit it's crime coin and that that's a problem for crime coin

also roads are useful for non-criming and crime coin isn't

programmer_belch@lemmy.dbzer0.com · -8 pts · 2y (19 replies)

Yes, I agree there is a stigma around bitcoin because of the amount of scams and ransomware that is around them but I don't want to delegitimize decentralized currency.

Currently the options are really bad because of the amount of resources they consume and their use as an investment option. I really wish there could be an option to have money outside of government control.

sailor_sega_saturn@awful.systems · 20 pts · 2y (15 replies)

I agree decentralized currency is great.

All I need is some quarters and I can start my laundry without waiting half an hour for the centralized blockchain ledger's global state to acknowledge the transaction.

programmer_belch@lemmy.dbzer0.com · -3 pts · 2y (14 replies)

That's true, cash can be a more private alternative to electronic transactions but I also want an electronic counterpart, something with private and public keys. I am not knowledgeable enough on currencies and transactions to know how the system would work

rook@awful.systems · 5 pts · 2y (11 replies)

Happily there are plenty of good examples of how such a system would work in practise… Web3 is Going Just Great, Attack of the 50 Foot Blockchain or Amy Castor perhaps.

programmer_belch@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 2y

Blockchain will never be a good system of private transactions as it takes too many resources to run it and you have to fork it all of the time because the chains get too heavy. That much I know and agree with.

I want an alternative and currently after the grift made because of crypto, no one wants to innovate in a private and decentralized currency. In truth, I haven't searched that much for an alternative.

Irelephant@lemm.ee · 2 pts · 1y (1 reply)

Like gnu taler?

programmer_belch@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 1y

Seems to be what I was suggesting and it doesn't even need blockchain. Another area that doesn't need the blockchain I guess

dgerard@awful.systems · 10 pts · 2y

here in the world, money is a function of society

Evinceo@awful.systems · 6 pts · 2y (1 reply)

I really wish there could be an option to have money outside of government control.

Define control

programmer_belch@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 2y

Knowing the where, who and why of every transaction. In other chain I agree cash is a good alternative but without an electronic component that I would prefer.

o7___o7@awful.systems · 18 pts · 2y

Aktually, you can't ban roads because normal people use them

Shawdow194@kbin.run · -8 pts · 2y (1 reply)

Ban cash then! BTC isnt a holy grail but a deregulated international currency isnt a bad idea

dgerard@awful.systems · 12 pts · 2y

boy was that a quick exit

fasterandworse@awful.systems · 9 pts · 2y (3 replies)

What the fuck happened here?

smallpatatas@lemm.ee · 10 pts · 2y (2 replies)

i dont know i just posted a silly thing and all hell broke loose 😭

fasterandworse@awful.systems · 11 pts · 2y

The fediverse has randomly placed wormholes

dgerard@awful.systems · 9 pts · 2y

don't worry you can't break the fediverse it comes pre-broken for your inconvenience

V0ldek@awful.systems · 8 pts · 2y

πŸ‘€πŸ’° ?

toothpaste_sandwich@feddit.nl · 5 pts · 2y

Very good and well made

zout@fedia.io · 1 pts · 2y (13 replies)

Maybe a hot take, but I think emojis are stupid, so maybe bitcoin deserves one after all?

V0ldek@awful.systems · 6 pts · 2y (7 replies)

emojis are stupid

Really curious on what grounds, like is the entire idea of a pictogram stupid?

zout@fedia.io · 4 pts · 2y (6 replies)

I'm 48 years old, so I didn't grow up with them. I do think some of them have their place though, but there's quite a lot of novelty emojis. So I guess that I'm an old guy who only likes the old ascii emoticons.

swlabr@awful.systems · 10 pts · 2y (4 replies)

😑🀜☁️

zout@fedia.io · 4 pts · 2y (2 replies)

🫡

Evinceo@awful.systems · 6 pts · 2y

π“†―π“‡‹π“‚‹π“ŽΌπ“‡‹π“ˆ– π“‰”π“‡‹π“…‚π“‚‹π“…±π“ŽΌπ“ƒ­π“‡Œπ“Šͺπ“‰”π“‡‹π“Ž’π“‹΄ vs π€Šπ€„π€ƒ π€π€„π€π€Žπ€

froztbyte@awful.systems · 3 pts · 2y

β€œuncle sam…”

Sidyctism2@discuss.tchncs.de · -1 pts · 2y

PUNCH THE FART

mawhrin@awful.systems · 2 pts · 2y

πŸ–”

i'm fifty, and you're full of it.

laughterlaughter@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 2y (4 replies)

Emojis are not stupid when used well. They help add more context to a text.

If people use emojis stupidly, chances are they'll use "the alphabet" stupidly as well if there were no emojis. As in "lol like wat de eff amirite anyway bei felicia!"

glimse@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 2y (3 replies)

Bro said emojis aren't stupid πŸ’€πŸ’€πŸ’€

... I'm so sorry for that. I don't disagree with you at all

laughterlaughter@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 2y (2 replies)

haha I don't understand your comment. Why are you sorry while agreeing with me??

Edit: I got it now.

glimse@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 2y (1 reply)

Because I used emoji in an annoying way as a joke lol

laughterlaughter@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 2y

Oh, hehe, I got it now πŸ˜†

ElliotCross@sh.itjust.works · -1 pts · 2y (1 reply)
[ removed ]
froztbyte@awful.systems · 2 pts · 2y

for those playing the drinking game, that's a shot combined with a scrabble triple score combined with a jinx

UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world · -4 pts · 2y

Silly emojis and joke emojis are good, though.