Why is IntelliJ's remote development UX much slower / harder to use than VScode?

11 points · 8 comments · view on lemmy.world

8 Comments

onlinepersona@programming.dev · -1 pts · 1y (7 replies)

wdym?

isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca · 4 pts · 1y (5 replies)

I can corroborate OP's experience, it's basically unusable on iJ and it disconnects all the time, with catastrophic results. I just don't use it and stick to VS Code for SSH work.

tyler@programming.dev · 2 pts · 1y (4 replies)

I think that was true like six months ago, but I just did it again like two weeks ago with my coworker and it has vastly improved. I had no disconnects and it was very fast the whole time.

isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca · 1 pts · 1y (3 replies)

Good to know, I'll give it another shot then :)

tyler@programming.dev · 1 pts · 1y (2 replies)

I'm guessing it's still not as good as VS Code, but compared to before, it's much better.

isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca · 2 pts · 1y (1 reply)

VSCode is much lighter (both in CPU and in storage space) to run than the JetBrains toolchain, so that's another aspect.

I had WebStorm take down a server while it was trying to handle the remote toolchain haha

tyler@programming.dev · 1 pts · 1y

That’s impressive lol.

Windex007@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 1y

Not OP, but in my experience, remote vscode is way snappier than intellij's equivalent feature. Essentially indistinguishable from local dev.

I don't doubt the main reason is just the maturity of the feature. VScode has had this for over 6 years and I it's still basically (actually?) a beta feature in intellij