Rdr1, in my opinion, if you have an xbox 360, ps3, or Nintendo switch, or are fine with emulating. If not, just play rdr2 instead of buying hardware for a game you might not like.
I played rdr2 first and later played rdr1. Playing 1 made me want to play 2 again, which I did and loved it even more the 2nd time rpund.
I personally don't think playing them out of order ruins anything story wise. It's like watching or playing a sequel as opposed to a prequel if you play 2 first.
But...whilst rdr1 still looks and plays great, playing 2 first may take some of that away, as you'll be used to rdr2 which is just about as perfect a video game one can be. I'd therefore recommend 1 then 2.
9 Comments
clubb@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 1y
Rdr1, in my opinion, if you have an xbox 360, ps3, or Nintendo switch, or are fine with emulating. If not, just play rdr2 instead of buying hardware for a game you might not like.
Milan77@lemm.ee · 0 pts · 1y
I have nintendo emulator for pc it works fine
clubb@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 1y
If it does, than go for the first.
cmder@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 1y
RDR1 then RDR2.
GuStJaR@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 1y
I played rdr2 first and later played rdr1. Playing 1 made me want to play 2 again, which I did and loved it even more the 2nd time rpund.
I personally don't think playing them out of order ruins anything story wise. It's like watching or playing a sequel as opposed to a prequel if you play 2 first.
But...whilst rdr1 still looks and plays great, playing 2 first may take some of that away, as you'll be used to rdr2 which is just about as perfect a video game one can be. I'd therefore recommend 1 then 2.
BaroqueLobster@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 7 pts · 1y
I played RDR2 before RDR1 and regretted not playing RDR1 first.
CaptnNMorgan@reddthat.com · 2 pts · 1y
It didn't age well imo
VelvetStorm@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 1y
I've only played rdr2 and I don't regret it at all.
GreyCat@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 1y
There might be a RDR1 remaster soon, so maybe wait for that.
Here is the news