As if im going to be relying on source non-havers in an apocalypse. True apocalypse I'm dying because no way in hell I want to survive just to suffer and meet a grizzly death (e.g. from radiation, zombies, etc.). Something recoverable I'm fine, got my food, water and electricity sorted out. Also a backup copy of wikipedia :•)
7 Comments
TrousersMcPants@lemmy.world · 32 pts · 2y
Don't tell me shit if you can't back it up! I don't want to hear things, I want to know things!
jjagaimo@lemmy.ca · 10 pts · 2y
As if im going to be relying on source non-havers in an apocalypse. True apocalypse I'm dying because no way in hell I want to survive just to suffer and meet a grizzly death (e.g. from radiation, zombies, etc.). Something recoverable I'm fine, got my food, water and electricity sorted out. Also a backup copy of wikipedia :•)
shani66@ani.social · 2 pts · 2y
Honestly, with a copy of Wikipedia you could probably restart civilization pretty well.
NickwithaC@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 2y
Right to left
sircac@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 2y
There is no hope to be effectively saved by an unsourced saviour, specially during apocalypse…
QuentinQuiver@slrpnk.net · 3 pts · 2y
Only science needs sources. Maths doesn't
QuentinQuiver@slrpnk.net · 1 pts · 2y
The "source" is internally consistent statistical reasoning and moral philosophy. When explained well enough, it should obviously be true.
Explaining it properly is easier said than done, though.