Polling guru Nate Silver predicts Trump has 64% chance of winning the Electoral College in latest forecast

https://www.foxnews.com/media/polling-guru-nate-silver-predicts-trump-has-64-chance-winning-electoral-college-latest-forecast

-30 points · 48 comments · view on lemmy.world

48 Comments

glimse@lemmy.world · 15 pts · 1y (69 replies)

The only people who like the electoral college are people who lose the popular vote

wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee · -11 pts · 1y (68 replies)
[ removed ]
glimse@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 1y (19 replies)

What is superior about it at all? That it gives disproportional voting power to a few states?

wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee · -8 pts · 1y (18 replies)
[ removed ]
glimse@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 1y (16 replies)

...the electoral college keeps the union together...??

wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee · -6 pts · 1y (15 replies)
[ removed ]
glimse@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 1y (13 replies)

I'm thinking you shouldn't talk about the electoral college until you understand what it does because you're dead wrong

Power IS held by a few states....the swing states...that are made important because the electoral college gives them disproportionate votes. States aren't people and where you live shouldn't matter for the presidential election.

[https://fairvote.org/archives/the_electoral_college-population_vs_electoral_votes/](A vote in Wyoming has the same "power" as 2 1/2 votes from Oregon). What about that sounds right to you?

wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee · -8 pts · 1y
[ removed ]
amerika@annihilation.social · -2 pts · 1y

@wintermute_oregon @glimse

Diversity killed unity

amerika@annihilation.social · -1 pts · 1y

@wintermute_oregon @glimse

Remember the articles of confederation.

Federalism has always been a tricky balance.

We are the United States, not United Citizens.

LookBehindYouNowAndThen@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 1y (47 replies)
[ removed ]
wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee · -4 pts · 1y (46 replies)
[ removed ]
LookBehindYouNowAndThen@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 1y (43 replies)
[ removed ]
wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee · -5 pts · 1y (42 replies)
[ removed ]
Zeppo@sh.itjust.works · 6 pts · 1y (10 replies)

Ending slavery is not a conservative position by definition. Conservatism means continuing the system that is currently in place and accepted.

amerika@annihilation.social · 1 pts · 1y

@Zeppo @wintermute_oregon

Not correct. Conservatism aims for the eternal. Our system is feudalism, which chattel slavery replaced.

wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee · -4 pts · 1y
[ removed ]
LookBehindYouNowAndThen@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 1y (29 replies)
[ removed ]
amerika@annihilation.social · -1 pts · 1y

@LookBehindYouNowAndThen @wintermute_oregon

By definition, the Radical Republicans were progressives.

Back then it had a lot more to do with industry than Communism.

wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee · -4 pts · 1y
[ removed ]
amerika@annihilation.social · -2 pts · 1y

@wintermute_oregon @LookBehindYouNowAndThen

Democrats were conservative back then.

Zeppo@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 1y

I guess if you knew basically nothing about US history that would be a convincing statement.

amerika@annihilation.social · -3 pts · 1y

@wintermute_oregon @LookBehindYouNowAndThen

Slavery sucked because it was diversity.

It was also cruel and pointless, since it was low quality labor.

The solution is ending diversity.

wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee · -7 pts · 1y (2 replies)
[ removed ]
squid_slime@lemm.ee · 5 pts · 1y (1 reply)

aged like fine milk

wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee · -2 pts · 1y
[ removed ]