There’s a pretty big omission in this article compared to other reporting: the fact that the uncommitted movement explicitly recommended not helping trump by not voting or voting third party.
In other words, they did endorse Harris. They just phrased it differently.
6 Comments
OprahsedCreature@lemmy.ml · 3 pts · 1y
Oh shit, look at all the BlueMAGA downvotes lol
Linkerbaan@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 1y
vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 2 pts · 1y
There’s a pretty big omission in this article compared to other reporting: the fact that the uncommitted movement explicitly recommended not helping trump by not voting or voting third party.
In other words, they did endorse Harris. They just phrased it differently.
p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 1y
The Intercept, that bastion of reporting that leaked a source and got her put in prison, made a big omission?
grimfuture@lemmy.ml · 1 pts · 1y
Who was put in prison?
p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 1y
https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/the-intercept-failed-to-shield-its-confidential-source-now-its-making-amends/2017/07/11/9d41284a-65d8-11e7-8eb5-cbccc2e7bfbf_story.html