I legitimately thought it was a foodbank that required proof of poorness somehow and charged a little above cost(don’t worry I hear Loblaws is also the supplier so they’ll just inflate the cost).
My hopes are dashed upon the rocks such that seeing it was a Bearverton article sparked no joy in me.
11 Comments
DeathbringerThoctar@lemmy.world · 47 pts · 1y
I'm glad I noticed this was The Beaverton before I went and burned down the local Superstore.
The_Helmet_Stays_On@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 12 pts · 1y
Could just ignore that it’s the Beaverton and do it anyways
a9249@lemmy.ca · 1 pts · 1y
Whats stopping you?
msh@coales.co · 14 pts · 1y
@onTerryO I thought this is what their "No Frills" chain of stores was already :blobcheeky:
weew@lemmy.ca · 11 pts · 1y
Lol
kemsat@lemmy.world · 11 pts · 1y
Isn’t a for profit food bank just a grocery store?
Showroom7561@lemmy.ca · 6 pts · 1y
Yes, but I'm sure there's some tax benefit to calling it a food bank. #RecordProfits
sunzu2@thebrainbin.org · 6 pts · 1y
Soup@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 1y
I legitimately thought it was a foodbank that required proof of poorness somehow and charged a little above cost(don’t worry I hear Loblaws is also the supplier so they’ll just inflate the cost).
My hopes are dashed upon the rocks such that seeing it was a Bearverton article sparked no joy in me.
jerkface@lemmy.ca · 5 pts · 1y
The pages of The Beaverton today, the Toronto Star tomorrow.
a9249@lemmy.ca · 4 pts · 1y
LET THEM EAT CAKE - Galen, probably.
jupdown@lemmy.ca · 4 pts · 1y
I laughed way too hard at this. God damn the Beaverton is just on fire these days...
abbiistabbii@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 pts · 1y