Vulcan internal conversation

Source

58 points · 10 comments · view on lemmy.world

10 Comments

thepineapplejumped@lemm.ee · 9 pts · 1y (9 replies)

Any info on the original? Am unaware of this story

threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works · 12 pts · 1y (3 replies)

Discussions on !spaceflight@sh.itjust.works

TWeaK@lemm.ee · 9 pts · 1y

Man I'm starting to fall behind on Manley's videos! Going to fix that now, thanks for the prompt.

thepineapplejumped@lemm.ee · 5 pts · 1y (1 reply)

Wow pretty cool, wonder how that impacts certification. I am guessing there are multiple categories that a rocket system needs to pass checks in order to pass, so maybe they have a contingency for such cases.

threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works · 4 pts · 1y

Yeah, if I were the USSF, I'm not sure I would be comfortable putting a billion-dollar spy satellite atop Vulcan just yet. I'd probably want a bit more investigation into the GEM 63XL SRBs before giving them the stamp of approval.

Idea@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 7 pts · 1y (3 replies)

Back fell off

IndiBrony@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 1y (2 replies)

Is that supposed to happen?

Idea@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 7 pts · 1y (1 reply)

That's not very typical, no.

threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 1y

I mean, "the back fell off" is kind of the entire concept of rocket stages, so in a way, it is typical. They usually have to fall off in the correct sequence, at the correct time, and in one piece though.

TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 1y

it had some of failure but it made it up anyways