Why not just speed augment your glaive? There's a tradeoff in damage, sure, but you still get the range (and mathematically, the damage tradeoff should work out to an equivalent DPS, just without getting hit twice in a row every other turn while waiting for your glaive).
No, I think it's worse than just transmuting into a greatsword. The game doesn't agument proportionally, it just multiplies one by .66 and the other by 1.33
7 Comments
Vencedor@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 1y
You don't even need a glaive for this
Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net · 1 pts · 1y
No, but it's what I had
Vencedor@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 1y
Couldn't transmutate? I tend to not use glaives because of how slow they are
Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net · 2 pts · 1y
I did later on. I'm with you: they are brutal. I had a ring of furor I was leaning on to help get by til I found a transmute
echo_vigil@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 1y
Why not just speed augment your glaive? There's a tradeoff in damage, sure, but you still get the range (and mathematically, the damage tradeoff should work out to an equivalent DPS, just without getting hit twice in a row every other turn while waiting for your glaive).
Vencedor@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 1y
No, I think it's worse than just transmuting into a greatsword. The game doesn't agument proportionally, it just multiplies one by .66 and the other by 1.33
TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 1y