According to the video, the original effort to get this passenger rail set up died in 2016 because Union Pacific wasn't interested and that's (theoretically) changed now. I wonder if it's just a change in management decision makers or if UP's business is down on those routes and it'd actually benefit them to get a slice of that traffic.
I do wonder what the projected cost might be to make this a reality - the rep from the rail line project said a study projected a 20% in traffic on 35 if the rail line were to be completed. I'm guessing that's the optimistic number and it doesn't feel like 20% would be life-changing necessarily, so it's a real question of whether it'd be worth whatever the cost might be
3 Comments
keltaris@lemm.ee · 5 pts · 3y
According to the video, the original effort to get this passenger rail set up died in 2016 because Union Pacific wasn't interested and that's (theoretically) changed now. I wonder if it's just a change in management decision makers or if UP's business is down on those routes and it'd actually benefit them to get a slice of that traffic.
I do wonder what the projected cost might be to make this a reality - the rep from the rail line project said a study projected a 20% in traffic on 35 if the rail line were to be completed. I'm guessing that's the optimistic number and it doesn't feel like 20% would be life-changing necessarily, so it's a real question of whether it'd be worth whatever the cost might be
Ginjutsu@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 3y
UP changing their minds could also have something to do with the Brightline's apparent success in Florida.
I say bring it on. The more reasons to avoid taking 35, the better.
lumberjacked@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 3y
From the website it looks like UP just said “sure, we will listen.”
I could have used this twice in the last month but I’m Not holding my breath.
https://www.restartlonestarraildistrict.org/news