Come on already, it's the XXI century.

145 points · 9 comments · view on lemmy.world

9 Comments

Blaster_M@lemmy.world · 28 pts · 1y (4 replies)

Short-earth creationism (7,000 years from zero to human) is ridiculous.

jrs100000@lemmy.world · 35 pts · 1y (2 replies)

The Earth is probably under 100 years old, since all of the people I personally know and trust are unable to provide first hand confirmation of its existence beyond that time frame.

SanndyTheManndy@lemmy.world · 19 pts · 1y (1 reply)

The Earth is 5 days old, since it has been 5 days since Thursday.

jrs100000@lemmy.world · 13 pts · 1y

If that means I dont have to work on Thursdays anymore, then hallelujah I have seen the light!

DragonsInARoom@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 1y

I'm baised toward tall-earth destructionism myself (infinate to the start of the universe is the only true explanation.) The earth is a chad whom monopolizes all the stacies and doesn't leave any for the rest of the men.

disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 1y (2 replies)

There is scientific room for creationism within agnosticism.

buttfarts@lemy.lol · 23 pts · 1y (1 reply)

Young Earth is the culprit. Catholics have been onboard with the big bang since a long time ago

Revan343@lemmy.ca · 14 pts · 1y

a long time ago

You could say that...what with the theory first being proposed by a Catholic priest (who was also an astronomer, mathematician, and physicist).

daddy32@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 1y