Crumb
c/linux · by DollyDuller@programming.dev · 1y

ShredOS - A small Linux distribution to erase your traces

https://github.com/PartialVolume/shredos.x86_64

ShredOS is a USB bootable (BIOS or UEFI) small linux distribution with the sole purpose of securely erasing the entire contents of your disks using the program nwipe.

54 points · 9 comments · view on lemmy.world

9 Comments

kadup@lemmy.world · 14 pts · 1y
[ removed ]
marius@feddit.org · 3 pts · 1y

I guess you could use any other distro for this that has a live boot, no? Still handy though

JoMiran@lemmy.ml · 3 pts · 1y (7 replies)

Back when I used to work for others, I would always remove the disk drive and replace it with an identical uet fresh out of the box one and a fresh Windows install. A few hundred dollars and a little work is a small price to pay.

possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip · 0 pts · 1y (6 replies)

That's not worth the price at all. There is really no risk

Deckweiss@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 1y (5 replies)

Freelancers take about 100$ pee hour where I live. (and thats a low rate, usually it's more)

Whith theoretical possibilities like https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.10192v1 you still have to do multiple passes, which takes hours, even on an NVME.

Even running something like https://par.nsf.gov/servlets/purl/10446654 takes more than an hour.

A new 1TB nvme can be had for 60$ on amazon. Swapping it takes 5 minutes. So unless the client pays for the time, it is not worth it.

x00z@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 1y (4 replies)

When I worked in an IT office, we often had multiple erase and clone processes going at the same time. We used machines like this: https://www.amazon.com/StarTech-com-Bay-eSATA-SATA-Standalone/dp/B005CQ12W2 (First search result). We started the process and worked on other stuff. We had a flat fee of €40 or something for a HDD to SSD upgrade (clone + erase + installation). The actual work was 15-20 minutes.

Nobody is wasting actual time when you can just have the process going when doing other stuff.

Deckweiss@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 1y (3 replies)

I agree that it is worth it at scale, but for a freelancer it won't make much financial difference getting a new drive after a project.

x00z@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 1y (2 replies)

GDPR laws are a big part of it. It's illegal to not protect the privacy of your customers. We even shipped the erased disks to a specialized company.

But also, the only way for this whole "just get them a new disk" to be profitable is if you resell the old disks as new disks. Which just sounds like evil capitalism to me.

Deckweiss@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 1y (1 reply)

I don't think we are arguing about the same scenario at all.

Here is an example of what I have in mind:

  1. I work as a freelancer on a customers project.
  2. In my computer I have an 128G NVME (15$) which is seperate from my OS where I put the data the customer entrusted me with and the project files
  3. After the project, I take that NVME out, put it in a box on a shelf and buy a new one (15$) for the next project
  4. Some time after project completion, I can either trash the drives or send them in bulk to some data erasure service, or leave them on my shelf for ever.

As opposed to

  1. After the project, I take that NVME-1 out, put it in a box on a shelf and buy a new one for the next project (NVME-2)
  2. for the project after that, I again take out NVME-2 and put it on a sheld, I get NVME-1 from my shelf, put it in, run secure erase for multiple hours before I can start working on the next project.

My argument is, that the cost of the first process is negligible compared to the effort and hassle of the second process, for a freelancer that earns over 6x the cost of such drive per hour.

x00z@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 1y

My scenario was indeed handling the drives of customers themselves.

For your scenario I would just use some encrypted filesystem.