rule

https://lemmy.zip/pictrs/image/e5d6849c-e123-4f61-9306-0a5820ec0e17.webm

175 points · 12 comments · view on lemmy.world

12 Comments

Kidplayer_666@lemm.ee · 22 pts · 1y (9 replies)

I mean Lincoln and Washingmachine weren’t too bad

NakariLexfortaine@lemm.ee · 23 pts · 1y (7 replies)

Lincoln would be too busy trying to talk God into a wrestling match to even notice anyone else was around.

Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 10 pts · 1y (6 replies)

I dunno, Teddy might've got his attention

TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 6 pts · 1y (5 replies)

Teddy was a big time imperialist

electric@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 1y (3 replies)

Teddy would definitely belong in his own Medium Place.

TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 4 pts · 1y (2 replies)

Nah. He was a badass, but not a good person

benbrain@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 1y (1 reply)

But he did establish the national park service, which I think lands him in the secret third place

TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 5 pts · 1y

He did that so he could enjoy his hunting trips in peace. There was also a forgettable president or two that seemed like better people than him. He's top 5, but not better than Lincoln or Carter.

Carter was almost a neolib, but he promoted the humanitarian side of liberalism better than almost every other president. He was too weak for the neoliberals and too neoliberal for the social democrats.

Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 7 pts · 1y

If anyone could climb out of hell, i would bet on Teddy.

Taalnazi@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 1y

Washington held slaves.

Teddy Roosevelt, maybe? Was pretty supportive of the labourer and progressed a lot of good societal change.

NatakuNox@lemmy.world · 17 pts · 1y

Lincoln definitely up there somewhere

BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world · 14 pts · 1y

FDR was aight, but for modern presidents I think Jimmy the real deal.