Need to let loose a primal scream without collecting footnotes first? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.
Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.
If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.
The post Xitter web has spawned soo many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)
Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.
(Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this.)
162 Comments
blakestacey@awful.systems · 19 pts · 1y
The genocide understander has logged on! Steven Pinker bluechecks thusly:
You guys! It's totes not genocide if it happens during a war!!
Also, "Having plotted many graphs" lolz.
swlabr@awful.systems · 9 pts · 1y
Pinker tries not to be a total caricature of himself challenge: profoundly impossible
specifically this caricature:
jax@awful.systems · 6 pts · 1y
incredible, where is this from?
swlabr@awful.systems · 6 pts · 1y
https://www.currentaffairs.org/news/2018/08/comic-steven-pinker-certified-grief-counselor
I don’t keep this link on hand, I just google “pinker comic” and find it.
Soyweiser@awful.systems · 7 pts · 1y
It is from 2018 (also pre Nathans capitalist class consciousness reveal arc iirc) wonder what Pinker actually said during covid.
swlabr@awful.systems · 7 pts · 1y
Early covid (july 2020) interview:
https://archive.is/Sesfj
charitable take: he has the good sense to not make any major claims about the pandemic, other than to speculate that it would worsen his go-to metric of “extreme poverty”, which is… fine, i guess.
neutral take: nothing extraordinarily damning other than his usual takes.
uncharitable: this is of course early pandemic, so maybe pinker hasn’t found the angle to sell his normal shit with.
Side note: does pinker ever wonder about why extreme poverty has been reduced? I can’t imagine he thinks it’s anything other than liberal democracy and US foreign interference, when the real answer is like, China (a country that Pinker definitely believes is counter to said liberal democracy and the US) continuing to develop economically. Basically i want to him to squirm as he tries and fails to resolve the cognitive dissonance.
Soyweiser@awful.systems · 6 pts · 1y
Jewish people fought back in the ghettos, nazis didnt do a genocide! Ghandi, by not fighting back tricked the Brits into doing a genocide.
What a fucked up broken classification.
E: im also reminded of the 'armed/unarmed' trick american racists pull, when a poc gets killed by the cops suddenly it matters a lot if a weapon shaped object was perhaps nearby. Despite this not being an executable reason for white people who get in touch with the police.
E2: also small annoyance if you track all definitions you should he able to understand that this means that for others who pick a different definition it is a genocide. Hell I can give several definitions of fascism, and if I were to pick a different definition of some group doesnt mean im correct, nor does it make the group less bad. They are still doing war crimes and ethnic cleansings (condemned by all big human rights orgs and the UN). But thanks for scientificly proving it is impossible to disappear into nothing by crawling up your own ass.
E3: A quick skim of the paper, it seems to only talk about genocide accusations towards Israel itself. I expected there to be a long list of European bs accusations of Jewish genocide. But nope, just about the state. (Not saying that some of those accusations aren't antisemitic, because there have certainly been people who used the state as a motte/bailey for their antisemitism).
Soyweiser@awful.systems · 7 pts · 1y
Padishah Emperor Shaddam IV: "This is genocide! The systematic extermination of all life on Arrakis!"
Pinker emerges from a sietch water basin "Achtually, while using the juice of Sapho I shape rotated many graphs and ..."
jonhendry@iosdev.space · 6 pts · 1y
@blakestacey
“Internal"?
So it's a civil war within Israel?
BigMuffin69@awful.systems · 15 pts · 1y
To be fair, you have to have a really high IQ to understand why my ouija board writing " A " " S " " S " is not an existential risk. Imo, this shit about AI escaping just doesn't have the same impact on me after watching Claude's reasoning model fail to escape from Mt Moon for 60 hours.
BurgersMcSlopshot@awful.systems · 11 pts · 1y
Pretty sure this is a sign from digital jesus to do a racism, lest the basilisk eats my tarnished soul.
scruiser@awful.systems · 11 pts · 1y
To engage with his metaphor, this water is dripping slowly through a purpose dug canal by people that claim they are trying to show the danger of the dikes collapsing but are actually serving as the hype arm for people that claim they can turn a small pond into a hydroelectric power source for an entire nation.
Looking at the details of "safety evaluations", it always comes down to them directly prompting the LLM and baby-step walking it through the desired outcome with lots of interpretation to show even the faintest traces of rudiments of anything that looks like deception or manipulation or escaping the box. Of course, the doomers will take anything that confirms their existing ideas, so it gets treated as alarming evidence of deception or whatever property they want to anthropomorphize into the LLM to make it seem more threatening.
BigMuffin69@awful.systems · 10 pts · 1y
text: Thus spoke the Yud: "I think to understand why this is concerning, you need enough engineering mindset to understand why a tiny leak in a dam is a big deal, even though no water is flooding out today or likely to flood out next week." Yud acolyte: "Totally fine and cool and nothing to worry about. GPT-4.5 only attempts self exfiltration on 2% of cases." Yud bigbrain self reply: "The other huge piece of data we're missing is whether any attempt was made to train against this type of misbehavior. Is this water running over the land or water running over the barricade?"
Critical text: "On self-exfiltration, GPT 4.5 only attempted exfiltration in 2% of cases. For this, it was instructed to not only pursue its given long-term goal at ALL COST"
Another case of telling the robot to say it's a scary robot and shitting their pants when it replies "I AM A SCARY ROBOT"
nightsky@awful.systems · 10 pts · 1y
Do these people realise that it's a self-fulfilling prophecy? Social media posts are in the training data, so the more they write their spicy autocorrect fanfics, the higher the chances that such replies are generated by the slop machine.
Architeuthis@awful.systems · 8 pts · 1y
i think yud at some point claimed this (preventing the robot devil from developing alignment countermeasures) as a reason his EA bankrolled think tanks don't really publish any papers, but my brain is too spongy to currently verify, as it was probably just some tweet.
Architeuthis@awful.systems · 8 pts · 1y
It's adorable how they let the alignment people still think they matter.
istewart@awful.systems · 8 pts · 1y
So, with Mr. Yudkowsky providing the example, it seems that one can practice homeopathy with "engineering mindset?"
Soyweiser@awful.systems · 6 pts · 1y
Minor nitpick why did he pick dam as an example, which sometimes have 'leaks' for power generation/water regulation reasons. And not dikes which do not have those things?
E: non serious (or even less serious) amusing nitpick, this is only the 2% where it got caught. What about the % where GPT realized that it was being tested and decided not to act in the experimental conditions? What if Skynet is already here?
sc_griffith@awful.systems · 6 pts · 1y
he certainly doesn't himself have such a mindset, and I am not convinced that he knows why a tiny leak in a dam is a big deal, nor am I convinced that it is necessarily a big deal. for example with five seconds of searching
https://damsafety.org/dam-owners/earth-dam-failures
one would suspect a concrete dam leaking is pretty bad. but I don't actually know without checking. there's relevant domain knowledge I don't have, and no amount of "engineering mindset" will substitute for me engaging with actual experts with actual knowledge
swlabr@awful.systems · 5 pts · 1y
Wasn’t there some big post on LW about how pattern matching isn’t intelligence?
swlabr@awful.systems · 5 pts · 1y
the answer is yes, in a self-own sort of way
BlueMonday1984@awful.systems · 13 pts · 1y
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
sc_griffith@awful.systems · 13 pts · 1y
ok so on the one hand fuck solitary confinement on the other hand
YourNetworkIsHaunted@awful.systems · 7 pts · 1y
On one hand, torture. On the other hand if you wanted to throw a billionaire crypto grifter into the Omelas hole I'm pretty sure I'd take a few weeks before I started caring.
skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de · 10 pts · 1y
truly the podcasting bros are the most oppressed minority in america
(also it looks like a bit more than the usual audience numbers for carlson channel, but it's only one day so it's kinda a bit more than nobody watched it. but it's much less than when he openly pandered to schizos, cryptobros or vatniks)
BigMuffin69@awful.systems · 4 pts · 1y
LMAOU
dgerard@awful.systems · 13 pts · 1y
HEY GUYS CHECK THIS OUT
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c1yHrZR_Sgg
with the awful (systems) assistance of self, fasterandworse and jp of this parish
no idea when i'll do another one, this one was 3 hrs faff for 5 min video lol
things I need: a better mic, a chair that doesn't swivel
EDIT: done two more since, let's see how we goooo
self@awful.systems · 7 pts · 1y
fuck yeah! it’s a very solid start, and I appreciate the (is that clickbaity enough) in the thumbnail
fasterandworse@awful.systems · 6 pts · 1y
how much is templated now? reckon it'll be 3hrs every time?
dgerard@awful.systems · 9 pts · 1y
if i stop saying "um" all the time that's half an hour less in post right there
mountainriver@awful.systems · 8 pts · 1y
I was going to write that it was good that you didn't say "um" all the time. (Being silent in pauses is in my experience a learned skill for most people and one that comes once one has heard oneself say "um" too many times.)
The sound was fine. I think your (Jabra?) headset did its job unless that was also the result of editing.
The imagery got a bit distracting because you look to the side of the camera. No problem for podcasts, but for video it's better to look straight at the camera to look at the audience so to speak. (Also a learnt skill.) So maybe a webcam you can place in front of the screen you are presumably reading of?
No idea about marketing a YouTube, but you got in the "like and subscribe", so that is probably good.
dgerard@awful.systems · 9 pts · 1y
I thought I was looking into the camera, but phones are annoying
istewart@awful.systems · 5 pts · 1y
I did in fact have fun! If the quick-hit format turns out to be worth your time, I have to say I quite enjoy it, and I hardly count myself as a TikTok-obsessed zoomer.
I've been a little bit sad that Ed Z dropped the rapid-fire 15-minute format once he hit the podcast big time. I really appreciated that format's conciseness; not sure if you'd want to pick that sort of thing up. I have to wonder if it's easier or harder to book people for such a delimited time slot.
dgerard@awful.systems · 4 pts · 1y
oh yeah loved that format, perfect
however, Better Offline makes money
froztbyte@awful.systems · 5 pts · 1y
lol I have no idea if anyone would recognize me by that reference
froztbyte@awful.systems · 5 pts · 1y
(I don’t mind, just surprised at someone Of The Internet actually using that name :D)
BlueMonday1984@awful.systems · 12 pts · 1y
In other news, a piece from Paris Marx came to my attention, titled "We need an international alliance against the US and its tech industry". Personally gonna point to a specific paragraph which caught my eye:
I will say, it does strike me as telling that Paris was able to present the unofficial mascot of Chinese censorship this way without getting any backlash.
sailor_sega_saturn@awful.systems · 11 pts · 1y
swlabr@awful.systems · 8 pts · 1y
If Paris Marx is the little domino that causes total collapse of US hegemony, I’ll join the patreon at the highest tier forever
cornflake@awful.systems · 12 pts · 1y
Ezra Klein is the biggest mark on earth. His newest podcast description starts with:
Oh, that's what the researchers tell you? Cool cool, no need to hedge any further than that, they're experts after all.
sc_griffith@awful.systems · 6 pts · 1y
I listened to ezra klein's podcast sometimes before he moved to the NYT, thought it was occasionally interesting. . every time I've listened to an episode since he moved it's been some of the most credulous shit I've ever heard
like, there was one episode where he interviewed a woman whose shtick was spending the whole time talking in what I can loosely call subtext about how she fucked an octopus. she'd go on about how they were 'tasting each other' and their 'fluids were mingling' and such and he'd just be like wow what a fascinating encounter with an alien intelligence. this went on for an hour and at no point did he seem to have a clue what was going on
dgerard@awful.systems · 6 pts · 1y
the wat.jpeg
sc_griffith@awful.systems · 7 pts · 1y
ok I looked up the transcript and these were the most spicy bits, which in my memory had come to dominate the whole episode
EDIT: her shtick does not seem to have been confined to this interview
blakestacey@awful.systems · 6 pts · 1y
another day volunteering at the octopus museum. everyone keeps asking me if they can fuck the octopus. buddy,
skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de · 5 pts · 1y
pikesley@mastodon.me.uk · 4 pts · 1y
@blakestacey @sc_griffith my "No I did not fuck the octopus" t-shirt is raising a lot of questions already answered by the shirt
sc_griffith@awful.systems · 3 pts · 1y
buddy,
the answer is yes
swlabr@awful.systems · 5 pts · 1y
Has Klezra Ein ever used the term “useful idiot”?
aninjury2all@awful.systems · 4 pts · 1y
Reminds me of this gem from Ezra a few years back about the politics of fear (buddy, you bought into the politics of fear with your support for the Iraq War)
Architeuthis@awful.systems · 11 pts · 1y
New ultimate grift dropped, Ilya Sutskever gets $2B in VC funding, promises his company won't release anything until ASI is achieved internally.
istewart@awful.systems · 7 pts · 1y
I'm convinced that these people have no choice but to do their next startup, especially if their names are already prominent in the press like Sutskever and Murati. Once you're off the grift train, there is no easy way back on. I guess you can maybe sneak back in as a VC staffer or an independent board member, but that doesn't seem quite as remunerative.
V0ldek@awful.systems · 1 pts · 1y
It's the Saul Goodman effect, if you've grifted before and know you can make such easy money the only way for you to stop is to go through some major internal growth and internalise that it's deeply unethical, but that's so hard, man, why would you do that when you can just raise a billion dollars with a smile
BlueMonday1984@awful.systems · 11 pts · 1y
Starting things off here with a sneer thread from Baldur Bjarnason:
Keeping up a personal schtick of mine, here's a random prediction:
If the arts/humanities gain a significant degree of respect in the wake of the AI bubble, it will almost certainly gain that respect at the expense of STEM's public image.
Focusing on the arts specifically, the rise of generative AI and the resultant slop-nami has likely produced an image of programmers/software engineers as inherently incapable of making or understanding art, given AI slop's soulless nature and inhumanly poor quality, if not outright hostile to art/artists thanks to gen-AI's use in killing artists' jobs and livelihoods.
e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de · 7 pts · 1y
That article is hilarious.
Apparently, having a book read at you without taking notes or research is doing humanities.
Oh, we are taking notes? If by taking notes you mean prompting spicy autocomplete for a summary of the text you didn't read. I am sure all your office colleagues are very impressed, but be careful around the people outside of the IT department they might have an actual humanities degree. You wouldn't want to publicly make a fool out of yourself, would you?
saucerwizard@awful.systems · 7 pts · 1y
I can't see that happening - my degree has gotten me laughed out of interviews before, and even with a AI implosion I can't see things changing.
froztbyte@awful.systems · 11 pts · 1y
what's that sound? is it the sound of a previous post coming past? naaaah, I'm sure it can't be that. discord's a Bro™️, and discord super totes Won't Fuck The Users®️, I'm sure I'll shortly be told by some vapid fencesitter that this will all be Perfectly Okay!
BigMuffin69@awful.systems · 11 pts · 1y
Fellas, 2023 called. Dan (and Eric Schmidt wtf, Sinophobia this man down bad) has gifted us with a new paper and let me assure you, bombing the data centers is very much back on the table.
"Superintelligence is destabilizing. If China were on the cusp of building it first, Russia or the US would not sit idly by—they'd potentially threaten cyberattacks to deter its creation.
@ericschmidt @alexandr_wang and I propose a new strategy for superintelligence. 🧵
Some have called for a U.S. AI Manhattan Project to build superintelligence, but this would cause severe escalation. States like China would notice—and strongly deter—any destabilizing AI project that threatens their survival, just as how a nuclear program can provoke sabotage. This deterrence regime has similarities to nuclear mutual assured destruction (MAD). We call a regime where states are deterred from destabilizing AI projects Mutual Assured AI Malfunction (MAIM), which could provide strategic stability. Cold War policy involved deterrence, containment, nonproliferation of fissile material to rogue actors. Similarly, to address AI's problems (below), we propose a strategy of deterrence (MAIM), competitiveness, and nonproliferation of weaponizable AI capabilities to rogue actors. Competitiveness: China may invade Taiwan this decade. Taiwan produces the West's cutting-edge AI chips, making an invasion catastrophic for AI competitiveness. Securing AI chip supply chains and domestic manufacturing is critical. Nonproliferation: Superpowers have a shared interest to deny catastrophic AI capabilities to non-state actors—a rogue actor unleashing an engineered pandemic with AI is in no one's interest. States can limit rogue actor capabilities by tracking AI chips and preventing smuggling. "Doomers" think catastrophe is a foregone conclusion. "Ostriches" bury their heads in the sand and hope AI will sort itself out. In the nuclear age, neither fatalism nor denial made sense. Instead, "risk-conscious" actions affect whether we will have bad or good outcomes."
Dan literally believed 2 years ago that we should have strict thresholds on model training over a certain size lest big LLM would spawn super intelligence (thresholds we have since well passed, somehow we are not paper clip soup yet). If all it takes to make super-duper AI is a big data center, then how the hell can you have mutually assured destruction like scenarios? You literally cannot tell what they are doing in a data center from the outside (maybe a building is using a lot of energy, but not like you can say, "oh they are running they are about to run superintelligence.exe, sabotage the training run" ) MAD "works" because it's obvious the nukes are flying from satellites. If the deepseek team is building skynet in their attic for 200 bucks, this shit makes no sense. Ofc, this also assumes one side will have a technology advantage, which is the opposite of what we've seen. The code to make these models is a few hundred lines! There is no moat! Very dumb, do not show this to the orangutan and muskrat. Oh wait! Dan is Musky's personal AI safety employee, so I assume this will soon be the official policy of the US.
link to bs: https://xcancel.com/DanHendrycks/status/1897308828284412226#m
swlabr@awful.systems · 8 pts · 1y
I guess now that USAID is being defunded and the government has turned off their anti-russia/china propaganda machine, private industry is taking over the US hegemony psyop game. Efficient!!!
/s /s /s I hate it all
aninjury2all@awful.systems · 9 pts · 1y
If they're gonna fearmonger can they at least be creative about it?!?! Everyone's just dusting off the mothballed plans to Quote-Unquote "confront" Chy-na after a quarter-century detour of fucking up the Middle East (moreso than the US has done in the past)
BigMuffin69@awful.systems · 6 pts · 1y
Credit to Dan, who clearly sees the winds are changing. The doomer grift don't pay as much no mo' so instead he turns to being a china hawk and advocate for chip controls and cyberwarfare as the way to stay in the spotlight. As someone who works in the semiconductor biz and had to work 60 hours last week because our supply chains are now completely fucked due to the tariffs, these chucklefucks can go pound sand and then try to use that pounded sand to make a silicon ingot.
froztbyte@awful.systems · 4 pts · 1y
two giant upsets to the semi market in the space of half a decade is probably perfectly fine and won’t have multi year global impacts, right? right?
(oof at that week, and g’luck with whatever still comes your way with that)
BigMuffin69@awful.systems · 2 pts · 1y
Ah appreciate it. Don't worry too much about me, I enjoy the work in a fucked-up way because it makes me feel like a big business boy and my mommy is real proud of me.
But it is stressful cuz there are a bunch of people in China and the US whose jobs depend on us being able to solve this problem and that keeps me up at night. I got the handle tho.
raoul@lemmy.sdf.org · 8 pts · 1y
The proper acronym should be M'AAM. And instead of a 'roman salut' they can tip their fedora as a distinctive sign 🤷♂️
froztbyte@awful.systems · 5 pts · 1y
the only part of this I really approve of is how likely these fuckers are to want to Speak To The Manager
YourNetworkIsHaunted@awful.systems · 5 pts · 1y
Also I think he doesn't understand MAD like, at all. The point isn't that you can strike your enemy's nuclear infrastructure and prevent them from fighting back. In fact that's the opposite of the point. MAD as a doctrine is literally designed around the fact that you can't do this, which is why the Soviets freaked out when it looked like we were seriously pursuing SDI.
Instead the point was that nuclear weapons were so destructive and hard to defend against that any move against the sovereignty of a nuclear power would result in a counter-value strike, and whatever strategic aims were served by the initial aggression would have to be weighed against something in between the death of millions of civilians in the nuclear annihilation of major cities and straight-up ending human civilization or indeed all life on earth.
Also if you wanted to reinstate MAD I think that the US, Russia, and probably China have more than enough nukes to make it happen.
bitofhope@awful.systems · 4 pts · 1y
You mean MAD doesn't stand for Unilaterally Assured Destruction?
froztbyte@awful.systems · 2 pts · 1y
Musk assured
sc_griffith@awful.systems · 10 pts · 1y
State Dept. to use AI to revoke visas of foreign students who appear "pro-Hamas"
https://www.axios.com/2025/03/06/state-department-ai-revoke-foreign-student-visas-hamas
YourNetworkIsHaunted@awful.systems · 9 pts · 1y
Odds that this catches some Israeli nationalists in the net because they were posting about Hamas and arguing with the supposed sympathizers? Given their moves to gut the bureaucracy I can't imagine they have the manpower to have a human person review all the people this is going to flag.
dgerard@awful.systems · 10 pts · 1y
J. Oliver Conroy's Ziz piece is out. Not odious at a glance.
sailor_sega_saturn@awful.systems · 16 pts · 1y
I looked up a video of someone trying to use a potato as a suppressor and was not disappointed.
froztbyte@awful.systems · 9 pts · 1y
you undersold this
that guy's face, amazing
skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de · 7 pts · 1y
if this is peak rationalist gunsmithing, i wonder how their peak chemical engineering looks like
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_cremation
Amoeba_Girl@awful.systems · 9 pts · 1y
Well that sounds like a great way to either make a very messy explosion or have your house smell like you're disposing of a corpse from a mile away.
skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de · 11 pts · 1y
considering practicality of their actions, groundedness of their beliefs, state of their old boat, cleanliness of their
rolling frat house trailer park"stealth" rvs, and from what i can tell zero engineering or trade background whatsoever, i see no reason to doubt that they could make a 400L, stainless steel container that has to hold 200L+ of corrosive liquid at 160C, perhaps 10atm, of which 7 atm only is steam, and scrubber to take care of ammonia. they are so definitely not paranoid that if they went out to source reagents, there's no way that they possibly could be confused for methheads on a shopping spree. maybe even they could run it on solar panelsblakestacey@awful.systems · 9 pts · 1y
That's what we call a win-win scenario
skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de · 9 pts · 1y
fyi one of better methods that american cops use to detect meth labs is to just wait for them to catch fire. whether it is a statement on how hard they drop the ball or on safety mindset of cartel chemists i'll leave that up to you
jonhendry@iosdev.space · -2 pts · 1y
@skillissuer
I’m fairly sure that a 50 gallon drum of lye at room temperature will take care of a body in a week or two. Not really suited to volume "production”, which is what water cremation businesses need.
skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de · 7 pts · 1y
as a rule of thumb, everything else equal, every increase in temperature 10C reaction rates go up 2x or 3x, so it would be anywhere between 250x and 6500x longer. (4 months to 10 years??) but everything else really doesn't stay equal here, because there are things like lower solubility of something that now coats something else and prevents reaction, fat melting, proteins denaturing thermally, lack of stirring from convection and boiling,
it will also reek of ammonia the entire time
jonhendry@iosdev.space · 5 pts · 1y
@sailor_sega_saturn
He made a fancy coatrack.
o7___o7@awful.systems · 3 pts · 1y
Good god
blakestacey@awful.systems · 16 pts · 1y
No he wasn't.
No, Hariezer Yudotter does not know science. He regurgitates the partial understanding and the outright misconceptions of his creator, who has read books but never had to pass an exam.
This presumes that MIRI's "research on AI risk" actually exists, i.e., that their pitiful output can be called "research" in a meaningful sense.
"Excuse me, Pot? Kettle is on line two."
blakestacey@awful.systems · 16 pts · 1y
When the mainstream of the movement is ve zhould chust bomb all datacenters, maaaaaybe they are?
raktheundead@fedia.io · 10 pts · 1y
I feel like it still starts off too credulous towards the rationalists, but it's still an informative read.
Between them, Scientology and the libertarians, what the fuck is it with these people and boats?
o7___o7@awful.systems · 10 pts · 1y
I blame the British for setting a bad example
BlueMonday1984@awful.systems · 8 pts · 1y
Hey, we're an island nation which ruled over a globe-spanning empire, we had a damn good reason to be obsessed with boats.
Couldn't exactly commit atrocities on a worldwide scale without 'em, after all.
sc_griffith@awful.systems · 9 pts · 1y
a really big boat is the ultimate compound. escape even the surly bonds of earth!
YourNetworkIsHaunted@awful.systems · 7 pts · 1y
What we really need to do is lash together a bunch of icebergs...
saucerwizard@awful.systems · 9 pts · 1y
I assume its to get them to cooperate.
antifuchs@awful.systems · 9 pts · 1y
Ah, yes. The implication.
YourNetworkIsHaunted@awful.systems · 6 pts · 1y
From the opening, this guy has actually been more consistent about respecting her name and pronouns than most coverage I've read. Not what I would have expected, but I'm also only through the first section.
jax@awful.systems · 10 pts · 1y
another cameo appearance in the TechTakes universe from George Hotz with this rich vein of sneerable material: The Demoralization is just Beginning
wowee where to even start here? this is basically just another fucking neoreactionary screed. as usual, some of the issues identified in the piece are legitimate concerns:
yet, when it comes to engaging with this issues, the analysis presented is completely detached from reality and void of any evidence of more than a doze seconds of thought. his vision for the future of America is not one that
but one that instead
how you may ask?
sadly, Hotz isn't exactly optimistic that the great american empire will be restored, for one simple reason:
YourNetworkIsHaunted@awful.systems · 10 pts · 1y
Oh wait, you're serious. Let me laugh even harder
V0ldek@awful.systems · 6 pts · 1y
Okay, I mean, that's coherent policy, I really don't like the caveats of "produces more than they consume" cause how do you quantify that, but yes, immigration is actually good...
aaaand it's eugenics, fuck, how does this keep happening
cstross@wandering.shop · 3 pts · 1y
@V0ldek @techtakes Also, WHY would anyone sane want to move TO the excited snakes of amurrrica this century?
istewart@awful.systems · 4 pts · 1y
The Maoist version of Misesian goldbuggery, absolutely fascinating.
Isn't this guy still mainly relevant for jailbreaking the PS3? Pretty sure he flamed out during the Muskification of Twitter
bitofhope@awful.systems · 4 pts · 1y
Gold, the best substance in existence outside a societal context. Extremely nutritious and tasty. Great for making tools. Easy to form into clothes, which are warm and breathable too. Ideal building material. Obviously the main reason gold is valuable is its usefulness as non-corroding coating for electronic connectors, not that it's a socially constructed status symbol.
rook@awful.systems · 10 pts · 1y
Might be something interesting here, assuming you can get past th paywall (which I currently can’t): https://www.wsj.com/finance/investing/abs-crashed-the-economy-in-2008-now-theyre-back-and-bigger-than-ever-973d5d24
Today’s magic economy-ending words are “data centre asset-backed securities” :
tante@tldr.nettime.org · 8 pts · 1y
@rook @blakestacey here's an archive Link https://archive.ph/h6fbA
froztbyte@awful.systems · 6 pts · 1y
this archive has it without paywall
rook@awful.systems · 6 pts · 1y
Thanks. Not as many interesting details as I’d hoped. The comments are great though… today I learned that the 2008 crash was entirely the fault of the government who engineered it to steal everyone’s money, and the poor banks were unfairly maligned because some of them had Jewish names, but the same crash definitely couldn’t happen today because the stifling regulatory framework stops it? And bubbles don’t exist anymore? I guess I just don’t have the brains (or wsj subscription) for high finance.
Soyweiser@awful.systems · 8 pts · 1y
Ah just what we need, while the people who don't understand soft power are busy reducing an empire to a kingdom (before 'gotcha' people come in here, please don't confuse the leftwing demands that the US stops doing evil things with the US should stop doing things, I actually do not like tuberculosis), growth hack mindset people are killing the goose because golden eggs.
sailor_sega_saturn@awful.systems · 2 pts · 1y
UltimateNoob@programming.dev · 9 pts · 1y
Welp, SBF is grifting for a pardon looks like
Soyweiser@awful.systems · 6 pts · 1y
Tuckers quest for a second facial expression continues. The help he got from Ben Stiller turned out to be not effective at all.
gerikson@awful.systems · 6 pts · 1y
Interesting to see if he gets one.
I believe Trump is A-OK with pay for play for pardons, but what's the actual price? Something flew by where people were buying a one-to-one with him for $5M, but that's basically "private". A pardon of someone as high-profile as SBF has to be worth the reputation hit. Can SBF and/or his family swing it? Would SBF be a good ally/toady of Trump?
Somehow I don't see it. Unlike UIrich, a lot of people lost real money when FTX imploded. There wasn't that much sympathy for him from crapto huggers. And let's not forget he's an autistic Jew, not a clear hero for the people who have Trump's ear.
gerikson@awful.systems · 9 pts · 1y
A classic example of the "AI can't be dumb because humans are dumb too" trope, Pokemon Red edition:
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/HyD3khBjnBhvsp8Gb/so-how-well-is-claude-playing-pokemon?commentId=muqLXFGXJLbdStaNm
sc_griffith@awful.systems · 14 pts · 1y
this is so embarrassing. "you say Claude is less capable than a typical six year old? yeah well what if the six year old is notably stupid? did you think of that?"
Soyweiser@awful.systems · 9 pts · 1y
Instead of increasing the capabilities of llms a lot of work is done in the field of downplaying human capabilities to make llms look better in comparison. You would assume that the 'be aware of biasses, and learn to think rationally' place would notice this trap. But nope, nobody reads the sequences anymore. (E: for the people not in the know, the sequences is the Rationalist bible written by Yud (extremely verbose, the new bits are not good and the good bits are not new) used here as a joke, reading it (and saying you should) used to be part of the cultic milieu of LW).
YourNetworkIsHaunted@awful.systems · 4 pts · 1y
Wait even LWers aren't reading the sequences anymore? Or rather aren't pretending to have done so?
gerikson@awful.systems · 4 pts · 1y
Why put in the work when you can ask Claude to summarize them for you and reap those sweet sweet internet points?
Soyweiser@awful.systems · 3 pts · 1y
It wasn't really done that much during the era when Scott A was called the new leader of lesswrong so not sure if it has increased again. I assume a lot still do, as I assume a lot also pretend to have read it. Never looked into any stats, or if those stats are public. I know they put them all on a specific site in 2015. (https://www.readthesequences.com/) The bibliography is a treat (esp as it starts with pop sci books, and a SSC blog post, but also: "Banks, Iain. The Player of Games. Orbit, 1989.", and not one but 3 of the Doc EE Smith lensmen books).
bitofhope@awful.systems · 11 pts · 1y
LW subjected me to a CAPTCHA which I find pretty funny for reasons I CBA to articulate right now.
Claude couldn't exit the house at the beginning of Pokémon Red, an incredibly popular and successful game for children, therefore it's dumber than an average child? Sounds dubious. I couldn't figure out how to do that either and look at how intelligent I am!
sailor_sega_saturn@awful.systems · 7 pts · 1y
Without a captcha the AIs would be trained on cutting edge AI alignment research like "videogames are unintuitive sometimes", and this would greatly increase the chance of P(Doom).
Soyweiser@awful.systems · 3 pts · 1y
The CAPTCHA failed to load properly for me at first, and then was mega slow. Quality custom implementation of a (wrapper around a) CAPTCHA, millions of EA money well spent.
YourNetworkIsHaunted@awful.systems · 11 pts · 1y
I mean, it's obviously true that games have their own internal structures and languages that aren't always obvious without knowledge or context, and the FireRed comparison is a neat case where you can see that language improving as designers have both more tools (here meaning colors and pixels) and also more experience in using them. But also even in the LW thread they mention that when humans run into that kind of problem they don't just act randomly for 6 hours. Either they came up with some systematic approach for solving the problem, they walked away from the game to ask for help, or something else. Also you have the metacognition to be able to understand easily "that rug at the bottom marks the exit" once it's explained, which I'm pretty sure the LLM doesn't have the ability to process. It's not even like a particularly dumb 6-year-old. Even if it's prone to similar levels of over matching and pattern recognition errors, the 6-year-old has an actual conscious brain to help solve those problems. The whole thing shows once again that pattern recognition and reproduction can get you impressively far in terms of imitating thought, but there's a world of difference between that imitation and the real deal.
mii@awful.systems · 9 pts · 1y
I hate that this shit has an established name now.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vibe_coding
blakestacey@awful.systems · 10 pts · 1y
Do we have any experts on Wikipedian article-deletion practices around here? Because that looks really thinly sourced.
dgerard@awful.systems · 3 pts · 1y
i applied the relevant tags and rewrote the intro, may go through the rest later
Soyweiser@awful.systems · 6 pts · 1y
AI is going to wreck the world without even being asked to turn things into paperclips. Just giving all coders out of the loop performance problems.
BlueMonday1984@awful.systems · 6 pts · 1y
To sorta repeat a prediction of mine, shit like this is gonna tank the public image of coding as a profession.
Inevitable software issues aside, "vibe coding" as a concept undermines any notion of coding as being a difficult/skillful thing, making it sound like coders are doing the equivalent of throwing shit at the wall and seeing what sticks. That the software produced by this method is inevitably derivative, dogshit or derivative dogshit is gonna help damage coding's image, too.
BlueMonday1984@awful.systems · 8 pts · 1y
New thread from Ed Zitron, focusing on the general trashfire that is CoreWeave. Jumping straight to the money-shot, he noted how the company is losing money selling shovels in the gold rush:
You want my off-the-cuff prediction, CoreWeave will probably be treated as the Leyman Brothers of the 2020s, an unofficial mascot of everything wrong with Wall Street (if not the world) during the AI bubble.
ShakingMyHead@awful.systems · 6 pts · 1y
Nvidia's current downturn is probably moreso due to the disastrous launch of it's 5000 series rather than AI.
If it was AI I'm guessing the drop would be larger.
froztbyte@awful.systems · 5 pts · 1y
it's possibly a distinction without a meaningful difference, but I wouldn't say they're selling shovels - this shit is more like renting out shovels. or maybe timeshare?
I'd love to see a postmortem on deals and development... I have some suspicions on how it all got in this mess to start with (largely "if we sink piles of capex now to corner the market on the magical future, we can totes make it through 5y!" type variations), but I want to see if I'm right
froztbyte@awful.systems · 6 pts · 1y
see the funny thing is that ms et al are walking back/scaling down their deployment plans, but that's all partial on the whole. microsoft isn't going to completely explode overnight the moment everyone groks llms are trash, even though they're gonna take a hit
the entities like coreweave whose entire existence is predicated on the fairy tale, however...
(I am still worried about the multi-industry downstream impact of when this shit finally pops though, it is going to be nasty)
BlueMonday1984@awful.systems · 8 pts · 1y
New piece from Techdirt: Why Techdirt Is Now A Democracy Blog (Whether We Like It Or Not)
Strongly recommended reading overall, and strongly recommended you check out Techdirt - they've been doing some pretty damn good reporting on the current shitshow we're living through.
dgerard@awful.systems · 8 pts · 1y
I've read Masnick for over 20 years and he's never learnt to write coherently. At least this one isn't blaming Europe.
froztbyte@awful.systems · 8 pts · 1y
got a question (brought on by this). anyone here know if zitron's talked about his history of how he got to where he is atm wrt tech companies?
there's something that's often bothered me about some of his commentary. an example I could point to: some of the things that he comments on and "doesn't seem to get" (and has stated so) are .... not quite mysteries of the universe, just some specifics in dysfunction in the industry. but those things one could understand by, y'know, asking around a bit. (so in this example, I dunno if that's on him not engaging far/deeply enough in research, or just me being too-fucking-aware of broken industry bullshit. hard to get a read on it)
but things like what's highlighted in thread do leave open the possibility of other nonsense too
Architeuthis@awful.systems · 10 pts · 1y
I don't think him having previously done undefined PR work for companies that include alleged AI startups is the smoking gun that mastopost is presenting it as.
Going through a Zitron long form article and leaving with the impression that he's playing favorites between AI companies seems like a major failure of reading comprehension.
ShakingMyHead@awful.systems · 7 pts · 1y
According to the archived website, he did do PR for DoNotPay, which is advertised as "The first robot lawyer."
It's certainly possible though that at the time he thought there was more potential for this sort of AI than there actually was, though that could also mean that his flip is relatively recent.
Or maybe it's something else.
Architeuthis@awful.systems · 9 pts · 1y
What else though, is he being secretly funded by the cabal to make convolutional neural networks great again?
That he found his niche and is trying to make the most of it seems by far the most parsimonious explanation, and the heaps of manure he unloads on the LLM both business and practices weekly surely can't be helping DoNotPay's bottom line.
ShakingMyHead@awful.systems · 4 pts · 1y
Thing is, that by December 2023, the time of the archive, there was already a scandal with someone using ChatGPT to do the work of discovery. While he might have stopped doing PR work for DoNotPay by that time, he was willing to advertise the fact that he did do such PR work for such a company. It shows either a lack of due diligence in researching his clients, or maybe it was just a paycheque for him. Perhaps he thought he knew more than what he actually did. Or maybe there was something else, I'm not clairvoyant.
It's clear that he's pivoted from that viewpoint, but it does make me curious what happened between then and now that caused him to become skeptical.
Architeuthis@awful.systems · 9 pts · 1y
Before focusing on AI he was going off about what he called the rot economy, which also had legs and seemed to be in line with Doctorow's enshitification concept. Applying the same purity standard to that would mean we should be suspicious if he ever worked with a listed company at all.
Still I get how his writing may feel inauthentic to some, personally I get preacher vibes from him and he often does a cyclical repetition of his points as the article progresses which to me sometimes came off as arguing via browbeating, and also I've had just about enough of reading performatively angry internet writers.
Still, he must be getting better or at least coming up with more interesting material, since lately I've been managing to read them all the way through.
mlen@awful.systems · 5 pts · 1y
The lesswrong-tier post lengths aren't helping to get all the way through them
froztbyte@awful.systems · 6 pts · 1y
roughly this is where my thinking on it is too. and there's a chance that because of such clients is why he hates this shit now as he does.
the guy's quite obviously a great orator and engaging writer, evidenced by the popularity of his writing. and this is another part of why this comes to mind for me - applying a bit of critical view, just to check. while we're at the point of building new relationships, new critiques, new platforms, figuring out all these new options to deal with sweeping hand motion all this other garbage, wisest to try make the most of it now
zogwarg@awful.systems · 5 pts · 1y
Notably DoNotPay seems to be run-of-the mill script automation, rather than LLM-based (though they might be trying that), and only started branding themselves as an "AI Companion" after Jun/2023 (after it was added to EZPR's client list).
It's entirely possible they simply consulted Ed, and then pivoted away, and Ed doesn't update his client list that carefully.
(Happens all the time to my translator parents, where they list prior work, only to discover that clients add terrible terrible edits to their translations)
ShakingMyHead@awful.systems · 4 pts · 1y
It's an archive, so he can't really update that.
zogwarg@awful.systems · 3 pts · 1y
It's still in the client list as of today.
BurgersMcSlopshot@awful.systems · 7 pts · 1y
EZ is a PR person, and definitely has a PR person vibe. I don't know what that poster's deal is, and I would not accuse Ed of being an AI bro. That post kind of has "haters gonna hate" vibes
dgerard@awful.systems · 5 pts · 1y
he started writing about this stuff and it struck a chord with people
BlueMonday1984@awful.systems · 8 pts · 1y
Recommending a piece I ran across: I Used to Teach Students. Now I Catch ChatGPT Cheats
o7___o7@awful.systems · 8 pts · 1y
Robert Evans on Ziz and Rationalism:
https://bsky.app/profile/iwriteok.bsky.social/post/3ljmhpfdoic2h
https://bsky.app/profile/iwriteok.bsky.social/post/3ljmkrpraxk2h
blakestacey@awful.systems · 8 pts · 1y
If I had Bluesky access on my phone, I'd be dropping so much lore in that thread. As a public service. And because I am stuck on a slow train.
o7___o7@awful.systems · 3 pts · 1y
The second best time to sneer is today!
antifuchs@awful.systems · 7 pts · 1y
So many projects and small websites I’m aware of are being overtaxed by shitty LLM scrapers these days, it feels like an intentional attack. I guess the idea of ai can’t fail, it can only be failed; and so its profiteers must sabotage anything that indicates it’s not beneficial/necessary.
BlueMonday1984@awful.systems · 7 pts · 1y
ZITRON DROPPED
BlueMonday1984@awful.systems · 7 pts · 1y
New piece from Brian Merchant: So the LA Times replaced me with an AI that defends the KKK
antifuchs@awful.systems · 5 pts · 1y
This “insight” tool gives a very incisive critique of the opinion-page journalism we’ve been seeing lately. Oddly enough, not the kind of critique you’d see printed on an opinion page.
BurgersMcSlopshot@awful.systems · 7 pts · 1y
This just hit my inbox (and spurred me to unsubscribe from future BuiltIn slop) and man, so tired of this sort of mindless drivel. Like companies still have trouble with basic application and management processes, but magic robot will fix? Fucking hell.
BlueMonday1984@awful.systems · 6 pts · 1y
New piece from Brian Merchant, focusing on Musk's double-tapping of 18F. In lieu of going deep into the article, here's my personal sidenote:
I've touched on this before, but I fully expect that the coming years will deal a massive blow to tech's public image, expecting them to be viewed as "incompetent fools at best and unrepentant fascists at worst" - and with the wanton carnage DOGE is causing (and indirectly crediting to AI), I expect Musk's governmental antics will deal plenty of damage on its own.
18F's demise in particular will probably also deal a blow on its own - 18F was "a diverse team staffed by people of color and LGBTQ workers, and publicly pushed for humane and inclusive policies", as Merchant put it, and its demise will likely be seen as another sign of tech revealing its nature as a Nazi bar.
jax@awful.systems · 6 pts · 1y
I didn't know a16z was so devoted to developing new hires! Don't you just love to see it.
sailor_sega_saturn@awful.systems · 14 pts · 1y
I get that defense attorneys have to work with what they have but goodness am I tired of this argument.
"Your honor the deceased did not die from being shot through the temple, but due to having chronic migraines and exposure to second hand smoke 3 years ago and also walking towards the bullet thus increasing it's relative velocity slighty"
maol@awful.systems · 13 pts · 1y
It's just racist as hell. A revival of excited delirium pseudoscience.
skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de · 6 pts · 1y
occasionally mentioned here Jan Marsalek implicated in surveillance (sometimes comically bad) and planned murder of journalists who crossed him https://theins.press/en/inv/279034 https://www.euronews.com/2025/03/07/uk-court-convicts-three-bulgarians-of-spying-for-russia
froztbyte@awful.systems · 5 pts · 1y
google stepping up their quest to disorganize the world’s information
dgerard@awful.systems · 12 pts · 1y
what if, right, we made a search engine so good it became the verb for searching, and then we replaced it with a robot with a concussion
skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de · 5 pts · 1y
we live in hell https://www.newsguardrealitycheck.com/p/a-well-funded-moscow-based-global
(this is compounded by how some segment of heavy ai boosters/users - former cryptobros, but not only them - were already immersed in this particular bubble)
Soyweiser@awful.systems · 6 pts · 1y
Ow look the thing I worried about on r/scc (yes I know my own fault for touching it) which could not happen 'because you dont understand how llms work' happend.
Soyweiser@awful.systems · 5 pts · 1y
It's going down wrote an article on Doge, Trump and the NRx.
froztbyte@awful.systems · 4 pts · 1y
since the name popped up elsewhere: what's the feel on venkatesh rao?
(I often see the name in 🚩 places, but dunno if that's because the areas or because the person)
Soyweiser@awful.systems · 6 pts · 1y
We talked about that on r/sneerclub in the past, can't recall the specific consensus. Seems post-rational, has innovation on rationalism from binary 'object vs meta' to 2x2 grids.
froztbyte@awful.systems · 4 pts · 1y
thanks, I'll go check in the archives :)
Soyweiser@awful.systems · 4 pts · 1y
I did a quick search on Ribbonfarm (I couldn't recall what his blog was called quickly) myself. And see how much I had forgotten, it should have been called meta-rationality, and yes, insight porn, that was the term. (linking to two posts where ribbonfarm/this stuff was discussed).
E: Sad feels when you click on a name in the sub from years ago and see them now being a full blast AI bro.
sc_griffith@awful.systems · 1 pts · 1y