I'm using DSLR for scanning. It's really good for the 35mm, but for the medium format it's quite tedious.
If you already own a DSLR I would recommend to explore that direction. If you don't own one, you should check local classified ads for a scanner.
The lab that develops my film uses a professional scanner to scan my negatives and send the digital files directly to me. They have multiple quality options up to 6048 x 4011.
A few years back I scanned a whole pile of photos from my childhood (I'm from 1974). My method was to scan the original negatives wherever possible on a flatbed scanner. Only scanning the actual prints where the negatives were lost or badly damaged. (Actually I still scanned those negatives just so I had them incase I ever wanted to try and digitally repair any scratches etc, either manually or via some automated /AI tool in the future.)
5 Comments
overcasteight@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 3y
I'm using DSLR for scanning. It's really good for the 35mm, but for the medium format it's quite tedious. If you already own a DSLR I would recommend to explore that direction. If you don't own one, you should check local classified ads for a scanner.
smeraltees@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 3y
The lab that develops my film uses a professional scanner to scan my negatives and send the digital files directly to me. They have multiple quality options up to 6048 x 4011.
Ingiald@feddit.nl · 2 pts · 3y
I use a dedicated negative scanner. Plustek optifilm it's called
countstex@feddit.dk · 2 pts · 3y
A few years back I scanned a whole pile of photos from my childhood (I'm from 1974). My method was to scan the original negatives wherever possible on a flatbed scanner. Only scanning the actual prints where the negatives were lost or badly damaged. (Actually I still scanned those negatives just so I had them incase I ever wanted to try and digitally repair any scratches etc, either manually or via some automated /AI tool in the future.)
Reverendender@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 3y
I am also interested in this