I sincerely, genuinely loathe Elon and everything he stands for, but the author is out over his skis here. I suspect he’ll be eating crow in the next few years.
He’s falling for the same fallacy that apparently every other journalist who doesn’t work for ars technica also falls for: that spacex is entirely Elon and not a bunch of well paid engineers who know what the fuck they are doing
4 Comments
traches@sh.itjust.works · 31 pts · 1y
I sincerely, genuinely loathe Elon and everything he stands for, but the author is out over his skis here. I suspect he’ll be eating crow in the next few years.
He’s falling for the same fallacy that apparently every other journalist who doesn’t work for ars technica also falls for: that spacex is entirely Elon and not a bunch of well paid engineers who know what the fuck they are doing
Cyclist@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 1y
Yeah, and his oversimplification of Falcon 9's payload capability is pretty disingenuous.
clothes@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 1y
It's so disappointing. Now the next person to write valid, honest critiques will have to overcome this author's selfishness to get attention.
Anahkiasen@lemmy.blahaj.zone · -4 pts · 1y
Great read, another piece of evidence of Musk's """brilliance"""