RISCy Behaviour: Open Source, No Supervision

715 points · 18 comments · view on lemmy.world

18 Comments

pHr34kY@lemmy.world · 87 pts · 1y (2 replies)

It took me a few seconds to realise that graph is y=x*86-64.

4am@lemm.ee · 23 pts · 1y

Subtle shade, I like it

I would have expected a graph within the interval 86-64 (or flipped I suppose). Now it makes sense again.

lurch@sh.itjust.works · 52 pts · 1y (1 reply)

btw ARM Holdings stocks have entered what I consider the affordable range, since Trump is tanking the US economy. Still RISCy. Just sayan.

Just sayan.

This is accurate, am consuming RISC V (news) for the emotional high, temporary bursts of irrational hope and am addicted.

smee@poeng.link · 6 pts · 1y

I've never tried RISC-V but I still need my fix!

mlg@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 1y

Don't worry, in a few years China will release some comparable and powerful RISC-V processors with some brand new in house fabs.

Although by that point it'll probably have 300% tariff, so probably stick to TSMC x86 and ARM anyway lol

Duuude! Go for it! The risc-v assembly is just beautiful!

lalala@lemmy.world · 12 pts · 1y (1 reply)

x86 was supposed to be obsolete 30 years ago.

[ removed ]

This hurts my brainhole.
Nice.

nasteva@jlai.lu · 6 pts · 1y

Wow, just wow.

It’d be cool to learn about the machining of a processor but it’s unfortunately out of my reach

Risc 5 is the hand.

Aqarius@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 1y (2 replies)

VS? Wasn't x86-64 originally an ARM creation?

excral@feddit.org · 14 pts · 1y (1 reply)

No, it was an AMD creation. Intel created their Itanium 64 bit architecture but it failed and died out completely

Ah, right, I got my acronyms confused.

What is the riscv image supposed to be?