Hard Drives Have Less Environmental Impact Than SSDs, Seagate Says

https://hardware.slashdot.org/story/25/04/18/127212/hard-drives-have-less-environmental-impact-than-ssds-seagate-says

A new report from Seagate reveals that hard drives significantly outperform solid-state drives in environmental impact metrics, challenging common industry assumptions about storage sustainability. According to Seagate's "Decarbonizing Data" report released this month [PDF], standard hard drives produce just 29.7 kg of embodied carbon dioxide compared to a staggering 4,915 kg for equivalently sized data center SSDs.

21 points · 3 comments · view on lemmy.world

3 Comments

gsv@programming.dev · 8 pts · 1y

The article is unfortunately a stub. The original insight stems from the peer reviewed report of Tannu and Nair (2022) and is based on a meta analysis of several life cycle analyses. It’s actually cited and linked in the Seagate brochure:

https://hotcarbon.org/assets/2022/pdf/hotcarbon22-tannu.pdf

Long story short: The reason a combination of the higher production related CO2e emissions and the higher power consumption given the current power mix.

vrkr@programming.dev · 2 pts · 1y (1 reply)

Says company that sells hard drives, but not ssds

andioop@programming.dev · 7 pts · 1y

I am all for pointing out conflicts of interest, but I bought an SSD external hard drive from Seagate, and just looking up "Seagate SSD" will take you to a bunch of Seagate SSD products. Is there something I'm missing here?