@protestation To me Fascism implies adding an overarching police state apparatus to corporatism. So perhaps, if there's still an entry for corporatism and a 'pointer' from the fascism entry, I'm ok with that, perhaps.
Personally I think the little changes are more insidious, for example "Need" has been conflated with "Want" in Websters. They ARE NOT the same. You may need things you don't want, and visa versa.
4 Comments
andrej@feddit.org · 20 pts · 1y
a) we have no source of Mussolini ever saying that b) It contradicts Mussolini's explanation of ideal state and corporate arrangement
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Kg7qfkQDE7A https://youtu.be/tXh6lgoVOjY?t=713
No_Money_Just_Change@feddit.org · 8 pts · 1y
c) the dictionary was not bought in 1987
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/fascism-corporations-corporatism-dictionary/
heretical_i@kafeneio.social · 2 pts · 1y
@protestation To me Fascism implies adding an overarching police state apparatus to corporatism. So perhaps, if there's still an entry for corporatism and a 'pointer' from the fascism entry, I'm ok with that, perhaps.
Personally I think the little changes are more insidious, for example "Need" has been conflated with "Want" in Websters. They ARE NOT the same. You may need things you don't want, and visa versa.
finitebanjo@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 1y
So when the state "owns the means of production" and that state is not a democracy? Gosh, that sounds awful familiar.