The YouTuber EngineeringExplained also explained how although the cybertruck complies with the requirements for its advertised tow rating, this tow rating system is vastly inadequate for the real world and all other manufacturers overbuild the crap out of their trucks because they know that.
This is why cybertrucks are known to literally rip their frames apart while towing what they are technically rated for.
Wait, so every car manufacturer has already identified the problem decades ago, decided that bad press is worse than a few more dollars, and fixed it? Except the disruptive genius who knows everything? Nice.
I could be compelled to agree, but "An air-breathing turbojet engine of that size..." doesn't have the same ring to it. Jet engine usually refers to something that has the traditional suck, squeeze, bang, blow method of propulsion, and rocket engine is used to refer to something that just burns straight fuel (with its own oxidizer, etc.).
Technically my air compressor blow gun is a rocket, but I wouldn't ever refer to it as one.
But hey, language evolves, so maybe being hyper specific will catch on.
FYI according to CPI inflation $2,500 in 1972 is worth about $19,000 today. Based on a comparison of median individual income that would be similar to about $25,000. Either way, the truck cost about the same as a Honda Civic does today.
In either case, how impressive is this really? If you balance the load properly to keep the tongue weight within spec, all you’re then doing is overcoming inertia and the friction of the wheels. What is the force to overcome those in either picture?
The magnitude of the friction on the tires is still dependent on the load so would be hard to say without crunching the numbers.. but ya I agree with u, its probably much less impressive than it appears, which is all that really matters w demos like this
There was also a demo of a cyberpunk pulling a train. I think it was practical engineering on YouTube. He then goes on to explain how little it actually takes to break fiction, why there's slack so you only pull one cart in the beginning and get inertia to do a lot of the work. It basically called out the stupid demo, and went on to show why trains are awesome.
It was a bit before my time but my cousin pointed this out to me a few years ago. Truck ads were absolutely nuts back in the 80s. They 100% destroyed every one that was in the commercials.
43 Comments
DaddleDew@lemmy.world · 168 pts · 1y
The YouTuber EngineeringExplained also explained how although the cybertruck complies with the requirements for its advertised tow rating, this tow rating system is vastly inadequate for the real world and all other manufacturers overbuild the crap out of their trucks because they know that.
This is why cybertrucks are known to literally rip their frames apart while towing what they are technically rated for.
Rubisco@slrpnk.net · 50 pts · 1y
This one?
Does The Tesla Cybertruck Have A Problem? Broken Tow Hitch!
DogWater@lemmy.world · 25 pts · 1y
Engineering explained is an excellent YouTube channel.
He also debunked the claim that the cybertruck won a drag race vs a 911 while towing a 911
DaddleDew@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 1y
Exactly
LH0ezVT@sh.itjust.works · 10 pts · 1y
Wait, so every car manufacturer has already identified the problem decades ago, decided that bad press is worse than a few more dollars, and fixed it? Except the disruptive genius who knows everything? Nice.
OpticalMoose@discuss.tchncs.de · 119 pts · 1y
blitzen@lemmy.ca · 14 pts · 1y
Shuttle Endeavour is housed at the California Science Center in Los Angeles, and fun fact, the Tundra that towed it is also still on display there.
ohulancutash@feddit.uk · 77 pts · 1y
Looks more like a rocket engine
walden@sub.wetshaving.social · 38 pts · 1y
Yep, an unfortunate typo. A jet engine of that size would be more impressive because they weigh more.
mrsemi@lemmy.world · 19 pts · 1y
walden@sub.wetshaving.social · 17 pts · 1y
I could be compelled to agree, but "An air-breathing turbojet engine of that size..." doesn't have the same ring to it. Jet engine usually refers to something that has the traditional suck, squeeze, bang, blow method of propulsion, and rocket engine is used to refer to something that just burns straight fuel (with its own oxidizer, etc.).
Technically my air compressor blow gun is a rocket, but I wouldn't ever refer to it as one.
But hey, language evolves, so maybe being hyper specific will catch on.
dalekcaan@lemm.ee · 10 pts · 1y
cadekat@pawb.social · 10 pts · 1y
Huh, TIL!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jet_engine
sourhill@lemmy.sdf.org · 10 pts · 1y
Tja@programming.dev · 6 pts · 1y
That's not a typo, that's a good old mistake. If they wrote "roket engine" it would be a typo.
walden@sub.wetshaving.social · 2 pts · 1y
Ha that's funny, I could have sworn I wrote "mistake", because I had the same thought. Oops
markovs_gun@lemmy.world · 42 pts · 1y
FYI according to CPI inflation $2,500 in 1972 is worth about $19,000 today. Based on a comparison of median individual income that would be similar to about $25,000. Either way, the truck cost about the same as a Honda Civic does today.
ikidd@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 1y
I paid less for my first house in 1994 than a cybertruck costs today, in current dollars.
Vehicles are insanely expensive in real dollars today.
markovs_gun@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 1y
It's more that they're way bigger and more complicated now. A simple vehicle is still pretty much the same as I showed in my comment,
Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de · 2 pts · 1y
the car market, especially in america, is completely fucked beyond saving. EVERYTHING is gargantuan and lethal.
in a sane world most people should only be driving small electric moped cars.
PanArab@lemm.ee · 2 pts · 1y
I don’t think you can even get a Chevrolet Colorado for that price. If only Chinese pickups were available in the US.
markovs_gun@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 1y
The issue is more a market issue than anything. People prefer to buy giant trucks instead of reasonable ones.
PanArab@lemm.ee · 2 pts · 1y
In the US you are mostly true. The Maverick and Santa Cruz shows there’s a market for sensible pickup trucks but it is relatively small.
skisnow@lemmy.ca · 30 pts · 1y
Continued astonishment at how consistently and repeatedly they self-own with stunts like this. Humiliation fetish is the only explanation.
Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca · 30 pts · 1y
LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 41 pts · 1y
The Mini Cooper EV pulled a plane not long ago, it's all for show.
GluWu@lemm.ee · 41 pts · 1y
Single humans pull planes all the time as strong man stunts
veroxii@aussie.zone · 19 pts · 1y
Planes are super light or how else would they float off into the air to fly? /s
Tja@programming.dev · 4 pts · 1y
That have hollow bones!
LeFrog@discuss.tchncs.de · 7 pts · 1y
I think you missed the
!:Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca · 1 pts · 1y
Thank you.
Tikiporch@lemmy.world · 23 pts · 1y
Considering what usually tows these things around, it's kind of a weak flex.
lettruthout@lemmy.world · 16 pts · 1y
We’re sure that the engine isn’t pushing the Cybertruck?
noughtnaut@lemmy.world · 15 pts · 1y
A giant thank you for reminding me of the now-ancient first-ever viral video - 405
Doctor_Satan@lemm.ee · 3 pts · 1y
The effects still hold up. Better than a lot of big budget movies of that era, even.
Hupf@feddit.org · 14 pts · 1y
Of course a plane would be super light, how else could it fly?
JoeDyrt@lemmy.ca · 2 pts · 1y
Empty Weight of a Boeing 747 is 325,660–336,870 lb. (wiki)
It carries 4 turbo-fan engines, each of which weighs approximately 12,000 lbs. (also wiki)
So the 747 weighs at least 27 times heavier than one engine, on average. ( iOS calc)
invertedspear@lemm.ee · 13 pts · 1y
In either case, how impressive is this really? If you balance the load properly to keep the tongue weight within spec, all you’re then doing is overcoming inertia and the friction of the wheels. What is the force to overcome those in either picture?
takenaps@lemmy.world · 11 pts · 1y
The magnitude of the friction on the tires is still dependent on the load so would be hard to say without crunching the numbers.. but ya I agree with u, its probably much less impressive than it appears, which is all that really matters w demos like this
baldingpudenda@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 1y
There was also a demo of a cyberpunk pulling a train. I think it was practical engineering on YouTube. He then goes on to explain how little it actually takes to break fiction, why there's slack so you only pull one cart in the beginning and get inertia to do a lot of the work. It basically called out the stupid demo, and went on to show why trains are awesome.
Pnut@lemm.ee · 11 pts · 1y
It was a bit before my time but my cousin pointed this out to me a few years ago. Truck ads were absolutely nuts back in the 80s. They 100% destroyed every one that was in the commercials.
vivendi@programming.dev · 2 pts · 1y
INDEPENDENT
FRONT
SUSPENSION
2910000@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 1y
I just watched the 1972 ad.
It's weird they used a mechanical grating sound in their background music
Ledericas@lemm.ee · 1 pts · 1y
looks like the warhead of icbm, hes delivering to putins planes.
HugeNerd@lemmy.ca · 1 pts · 1y