This is a legitimate strategy in Cities Skylines where you can drive up the taxes so high to earn insane amounts of money then lower them back when you lose half your population. Helps with traffic, too
I keep hearing that Cities Skylines II has constant bugfixes because each fix reveals new bugs. It's better, but still divisive. More people continue playing the original, according to Steam's statistics.
8 Comments
ThanksObama@sh.itjust.works · 26 pts · 1y
Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca · 4 pts · 1y
Unexpexteditcrowd.com
simple@lemm.ee · 8 pts · 1y
This is a legitimate strategy in Cities Skylines where you can drive up the taxes so high to earn insane amounts of money then lower them back when you lose half your population. Helps with traffic, too
YtA4QCam2A9j7EfTgHrH@infosec.pub · 3 pts · 1y
That was a good game. I wonder if the sequel was any good. I know it had a rough launch
yistdaj@pawb.social · 2 pts · 1y
I keep hearing that Cities Skylines II has constant bugfixes because each fix reveals new bugs. It's better, but still divisive. More people continue playing the original, according to Steam's statistics.
thatradomguy@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 1y
wee wee
Lootboblin@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 1y
Victoria 2
FelixCress@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 1y
Yup, V3 is shit apparently. Still there are aspects (like military) where V1 Revolutions was better than V2.