A close view of the GBO

145 points · 21 comments · view on lemmy.world

21 Comments

Jerb322@lemmy.world · 14 pts · 1y (9 replies)

GBO?

sbv@sh.itjust.works · 18 pts · 1y (1 reply)
artifex@lemmy.zip · 16 pts · 1y

Bummer, I was hoping it’d be Great Big Observatory given how silly some astronomy naming conventions are.

InquisitiveApathy@lemm.ee · 8 pts · 1y
[ removed ]
NegentropicBoy@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 1y

Great Bounce Off, it's a trampoline right?

InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 1y (1 reply)

Like others said, the green bank observatory. I meant to type it out in the post in the text description.

Jerb322@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 1y

No big deal. I only ask to spark conversation, instead of looking it up myself.

HiddenLychee@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 1y

This is actually the GBT, green bank telescope. Gbo would be the name for the whole sight.

Actually actually it would be the Robert C Byrd gbt, but he was a kkk member so that's not super cool. I ran some summer camps there in college and did a lot of research with its data.

UrPartnerInCrime@sh.itjust.works · 4 pts · 1y

Green Bank Observatory

Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 1y
[ removed ]
XeroxCool@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 1y (1 reply)

That's much closer than I got in my car without taking the tour. Was it off? Or do you work there and that Liberty is a diesel?

And yes, for those that question it, there are diesel Liberties. Far as I know, only diesels are allowed within a mile of the telescope because spark plugs cause radio interference

InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 1y

The diesel thing is correct and it belongs to GBO. I was there for others stuff with my university.

Beacon@fedia.io · 7 pts · 1y
scytale@lemmy.zip · 7 pts · 1y (2 replies)

The thing at the back looks like a massive Strandbeest.

InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 1y

Does have similarity in style. This is the worlds largest (steerable) radio telescope.

toynbee@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 1y

I thought it looked like an arm flexing.

state_electrician@discuss.tchncs.de · 0 pts · 1y (6 replies)

That photo is so bad. What is it supposed to highlight? There are three objects shown and none seems to be the focus of the picture. It's also not a composition that makes much sense. I'm not even a photographer, never learned much about that either. Man, this really annoys me way more than it should. But it's just so bad.

XeroxCool@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 1y (4 replies)

OK, what pics do you have to post to improve the community then? Nobody said this c/ has to be artsy.

state_electrician@discuss.tchncs.de · 5 pts · 1y (3 replies)

You can critique something that is needlessly bad. Like, take ten steps and take a clear picture without that damn car and building.

InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 1y

You're not wrong. Part is I liked the perspective and where I was standing for a picture.

humble_boatsman@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 1y

I believe he was trying to create some scale

XeroxCool@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 1y

I don't think you know the difference between a critique and just being negative. Your comments are needlessly rude.

bstix@feddit.dk · 3 pts · 1y

I disagree. The pointlessness creates a liminal space.