He's not wrong, but he's not right either. We have to decide how much warming we are going to allow. We can still brunt the worst effects of climate change.
Exactly. And i want to do as much as i possibly can to protect as many people and animals and biodiversity as i can.
If we can help places from being hit harder, we should do it.
If we can prevent 1 forest from burning down, 1 village from being flooded, 1 person dying from heat stroke, we should do it.
The climate is fucked. This will get worse and worse. But we can still make the difference in whether a forest burns down 100% or 90%.
4 Comments
NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 1y
He's not wrong, but he's not right either. We have to decide how much warming we are going to allow. We can still brunt the worst effects of climate change.
RageAgainstTheRich@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 1y
Exactly. And i want to do as much as i possibly can to protect as many people and animals and biodiversity as i can. If we can help places from being hit harder, we should do it. If we can prevent 1 forest from burning down, 1 village from being flooded, 1 person dying from heat stroke, we should do it.
The climate is fucked. This will get worse and worse. But we can still make the difference in whether a forest burns down 100% or 90%.
TheThrillOfTime@lemmy.ml · 2 pts · 1y
Awesome love that
WhiteHotaru@feddit.org · 1 pts · 1y
@muellertadzio@climatejustice.social talks about the „denial society“ regarding climate change and opts for social prepping as a community.