The sad part is, this image is still noticeably better quality than most of the stuff that ends up on those "confusing perspective" and similar type communities where there's supposedly something hidden or confusing going on but actually it'd be perfectly recognizable and not confusing at all if the photo weren't compressed all to hell and back multiple times using shitty settings.
13 Comments
kippinitreal@lemmy.world · 27 pts · 1y
I love the publisher ORLY³
cmgvd3lw@discuss.tchncs.de · 12 pts · 1y
Oh really?
Deceptichum@quokk.au · 10 pts · 1y
rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works · 3 pts · 1y
fubarx@lemmy.world · 21 pts · 1y
"Transparency is for Losers."
Boxscape@lemmy.sdf.org · 15 pts · 1y
Goes well with the one on datamoshing 😏
edgemaster72@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 1y
I don't want this GIF. I can't handle this GIF.
RubberElectrons@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 1y
That's horrible 👍
Tired@slrpnk.net · 11 pts · 1y
rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works · 5 pts · 1y
Top Text:
Jeffery Epstien's
ExposedExpress GrapeInvalidName2@lemmy.zip · 2 pts · 1y
The sad part is, this image is still noticeably better quality than most of the stuff that ends up on those "confusing perspective" and similar type communities where there's supposedly something hidden or confusing going on but actually it'd be perfectly recognizable and not confusing at all if the photo weren't compressed all to hell and back multiple times using shitty settings.
varnia@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 pts · 1y
This needs https://morejpeg.com/
pedz@lemmy.ca · 1 pts · 1y
Do I look like I know what a JPEG is?
aeronmelon@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 1y
It won’t be gone, just illegible.