This conversation is being recorded — and so is everything else you do in San Francisco

https://sfstandard.com/2025/08/05/ai-wearables-recording-devices/

75 points · 6 comments · view on lemmy.world

6 Comments

mugita_sokiovt@discuss.online · 10 pts · 1y (3 replies)
[ removed ]
Vanth@reddthat.com · 4 pts · 1y (2 replies)

Your consent doesn't matter (legally) in a single-party consent state. Which includes some bigs like New York and Texas. California is a two-party consent state though, so theoretically these people should be informing each other that they are using recording equipment.

mugita_sokiovt@discuss.online · 1 pts · 1y (1 reply)
[ removed ]
Vanth@reddthat.com · 2 pts · 1y

And I'm saying that in many states your lack of consent doesn't matter (legally speaking). Your consent is not required if someone else decides to record with their device.

I don't like it. Just stating that you declining to consent does nothing if someone else records you and gives the recordings to the police. That's not a search of you or your possessions, that's a search of someone else's recording that did not require your consent to be made.

None of this is new, just increasingly insidious and ubiquitous.

fubarx@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 1y (3 replies)

BRB. Building a wearable that sends out an ultrasonic screech to blow out nearby microphones.

Going to call it "Blow Me."

Edit: looks like they already exist: https://www.newscientist.com/article/2328652-voice-jammer-stops-anyone-from-recording-you-speak/

https://archive.ph/unmYO

Also, paper with more detail: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1904.08490v1

hbar@lemmy.ml · 1 pts · 1y (2 replies)

Is there a DIY build somewhere for something like this? From my quick googling I've only seen expensive off the shelf products

fubarx@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 1y (1 reply)
hbar@lemmy.ml · 1 pts · 1y

Awesome, thanks for sharing!

umbrella@lemmy.ml · 1 pts · 1y
[ removed ]