Interesting arguments but it absolutely reads like fanboyism. The "features missing from Wayland" in particular reads like someone who didn't care to give Wayland a fair shot
Right? All of the "if only you gave X11 a chance to develop this it would've been fine" at the same time as showing how diametrically opposed the maintenance team's philosophy is... Not a compelling argument
7 Comments
Vendetta9076@sh.itjust.works · 24 pts · 1y
Shut up. This whole x11 vs Wayland argument is so stupid
stevestevesteve@lemmy.world · 21 pts · 1y
Interesting arguments but it absolutely reads like fanboyism. The "features missing from Wayland" in particular reads like someone who didn't care to give Wayland a fair shot
brucethemoose@lemmy.world · 17 pts · 1y
Yeah, not to speak of stuff that doesn’t work/work well in X, and it’s bizarre quirks.
spartanatreyu@programming.dev · 18 pts · 1y
90% of the content depends upon an unspoken lie-by-ommision to present its case, or is just a flat out lie.
This whole post should probably just be reported and removed
vpzom@dev.narwhal.city · 11 pts · 1y
I think what little progress has been made is specifically because distros have started defaulting to Wayland
stevestevesteve@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 1y
Right? All of the "if only you gave X11 a chance to develop this it would've been fine" at the same time as showing how diametrically opposed the maintenance team's philosophy is... Not a compelling argument
lengau@midwest.social · 4 pts · 1y
Please don't spam this post.