Blowing up fossil fuel infrastructure would only create more environmental damage. Instead the best course of action is to murder the executives and politicians that allow/subsidize them
@Whey_Isolate@bezmuth That's right. Even without subsidize, we would use fossil fuel. Not most people and their car. But one tractor can do the job of like 500 people in a field. Then we get a few tons of cereal.
Genuinely came to that conclusion a while back as well. That and the fact that going heavily into politics is probably for most people the best chance to enact the most change. Which is a weird thought.
9 Comments
Whey_Isolate@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 20 pts · 3y
Blowing up fossil fuel infrastructure would only create more environmental damage. Instead the best course of action is to murder the executives and politicians that allow/subsidize them
sombrero@lemm.ee · 6 pts · 3y
this comment went from sensible to taliban real quick.
gkrnours@mastodon.gamedev.place · 2 pts · 3y
@Whey_Isolate @bezmuth That's right. Even without subsidize, we would use fossil fuel. Not most people and their car. But one tractor can do the job of like 500 people in a field. Then we get a few tons of cereal.
sebastian_m@kbin.social · 19 pts · 3y
Genuinely came to that conclusion a while back as well. That and the fact that going heavily into politics is probably for most people the best chance to enact the most change. Which is a weird thought.
Lux@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 14 pts · 3y
Literally me
Hitraptor@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 4 pts · 3y
Half of its made easier for you by its use of flammable material :3
sergio@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 pts · 3y
And the atmosphere is full of oxygen, we're already 2/3 the way there
SteveXVII@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 12 pts · 3y
I can't help but think that those who block private jets shut go further and destroy a few of them.
Betch@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 3y
Based and FF7-pilled