The Social Web Foundation has been experimenting with the lesser-known other half of the ActivityPub protocol. Here's what they're up to.
Social Web Foundation is Betting Big on Client-to-Server API
https://wedistribute.org/2025/08/social-web-foundation-is-betting-big-on-client-to-server-api/
5 Comments
Jumuta@sh.itjust.works · 11 pts · 348d
tf is this title
otter@lemmy.ca · 10 pts · 348d
I blame all the similar sounding terms and organizations in the fediverse space. It's actually pretty cool
What SWF is:
From this article:
It then has some other examples of how this protocol is being used
Jumuta@sh.itjust.works · 3 pts · 348d
that's pretty interesting I guess, having standard activitypub servers would be pretty good for reducing connectivity complexity as well I assume
deadsuperhero@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 348d
Yeah, it's not great. Unfortunately, there's not a great way to describe this stuff without either leaning into abstract terms, or using oversimplifications.
The short of it is: only half of the ActivityPub protocol really got adopted by most of the Fediverse: the stuff that lets servers talk to each other. The other half would allow for a lot of cool things to be built, with not everything being its own Fediverse server.
Jumuta@sh.itjust.works · 3 pts · 348d
Surely they could've just included some reference to activitypub, e.g. "Social Web Foundation is Betting Big on ActivityPub Client-to-Server API". that's so much clearer