All the same privacy harms with online tracking are also present with AI, but worse.
AI surveillance should be banned while there is still time.
https://gabrielweinberg.com/p/ai-surveillance-should-be-banned
https://gabrielweinberg.com/p/ai-surveillance-should-be-banned
All the same privacy harms with online tracking are also present with AI, but worse.
9 Comments
ItsComplicated@sh.itjust.works · 20 pts · 349d
Let’s do one better and get rid of all the surveillance.
ryannathans@aussie.zone · 3 pts · 349d
Everyday people love mass surveillance, how do you beat that
cmbabul@lemmy.world · 11 pts · 349d
What do yall mean “before it’s too late”, it is too late to stop from happening, we have to start planning on how to destroy it
SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world · 5 pts · 349d
Never gonna happen while we're under Republicans' grip - they are truly the party of hypocritical control freaks.
djsaskdja@reddthat.com · 3 pts · 349d
There’s very little doubt in my mind that Democrats want this too. Neither US political party cares about privacy more than the other.
possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip · 2 pts · 349d
Some politicians in either party support right to repair and privacy
djsaskdja@reddthat.com · 1 pts · 349d
It won’t be enough to save them.
possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip · 2 pts · 349d
While I don't like tracking and mass surveillance it is important to realize that the tech to do so has been around for 25 years.
chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 349d
I like and use DuckDuckGo but I don't see how they can guarantee this, similar to how a VPN might claim to keep no logs but you can't really know for sure.
I think it would be cool if there was software that downloads local copies of wikipedia, stackoverflow etc., and you can ask questions that will be responded to with relevant informative pages without that query going to a server.