Under pressure from Mark Zuckerberg and Sheryl Sandberg to monetize WhatsApp, he pushed back as Facebook questioned the encryption he'd helped build and laid the groundwork to show targeted ads and facilitate commercial messaging. Acton also walked away from Facebook a year before his final tranche of stock grants vested. "It was like, okay, well, you want to do these things I don"t want to do," Acton says. "It's better if I get out of your way. And I did." It was perhaps the most expensive moral stand in history. Acton took a screenshot of the stock price on his way out the door—the decision cost him $850 million.
6 Comments
trailee@sh.itjust.works · 22 pts · 342d
Probably more relevant today than when the article was first published 7 years ago, this is the guy who went on to make Signal possible in its current form.
None of the other private messaging services that people like to talk about on Lemmy have a solidly moral billionaire on their side.
vas@lemmy.ml · 4 pts · 342d
Though it's nice to have support from wealthy people.. Building a cult around any single rich person for them to give grants to their liking is not a good idea.
Instead I believe you need to fight for your right to have privacy. Currently it's Europe who is at risk with ChatControl ( https://fightchatcontrol.eu/ ). At other times, it's other countries. Some open projects (like Lemmy!) get funded by the European Commission. I believe this is a healthier approach than to believe in good rich guys who'd save you.
bright_side_@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 342d
First time that I read the article (it's a few years old).
What stands out to me is the following:
a) the one thing keeping heavy monitization and fully eroding of User privacy within the app at bay is the strong encryption - if Facebook finds a way to get rid of it (or maybe they are contempt with the ways they found to link Metadata to users?), that's a step they are going to do. b) the moment one sells the company/ownership switches to a publicly traded company, even when you have employees fighting against it, it goes downhill from there. Even if you are competent and have the willpower and dedication and standing to advocate for the right path, you mitigate at best - and only for some time.
c) and finally the big force in all of that: in the article you'll find Zuckerberg communicating to the WhatsApp that Wallstreet expects growth. Growth that they need to provide by compromising WhatsApps integrity.
Once you are part of the publicy traded world, agency and independency is lost to an extend that is not recoverable. I see it time and time again.
A_norny_mousse@feddit.org · 9 pts · 342d
This might be a good article (and/or a good guy), please don't get me wrong!
But Fuck Forbes, I hate the intro so much:
jaybone@lemmy.zip · 5 pts · 342d
Also when you already have 3.6b, leaving 850m behind isn’t like super impressive.
JigglySackles@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 342d
"Wealth is not as liberating as it seems"
Ok, give it to me please? Money would literally solve all my current issues.